CLK350
Member
From Elon direct
Inside Elon Musk’s first meeting with Twitter employees
Everything Elon Musk told Twitter employees about what’s next.
www.theverge.com
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
American Express pioneered it (AFAIK) back in the late 90's. It's not only not new, it isn't even recent.Several banks specifically allow cardholders to generate disposable numbers for the users security (Citi and Cap One were cited previously- though I suspect others may offer it too).
He didn’t “free the bird.” He hasn’t changed enough yet to claim that.
More to the point, that wasn’t the mission.
That was just the rationalization for the hasty impulse purchase. And wastin all this time on something so esoteric.
Um. It’s not even faintly a mystery Because the WHOLE STORY was about EV ownership spreading to less expensive vehicles -- and buyers able to afford 20,000-30,000 after incentives etc... It wasn’t about the Tesla, Mercedes BMW price point. It was about how the market has made a leap to a new and much larger tier of buyer.I confess I didn't read the article, only excerpts posted here. I find that many media hit-pieces use a misleading headline and first paragraph, then correct them "a few paragraphs later," where the truth is missed by busy people (and algos) who read only the headline and first paragraph. Now why would the media do that?
If you were publishing a piece about EV ownership, why would your example be an ID4 owner, despite the fact that 75% of EV owners in the US drive Teslas? (more in California) Why would you describe the EV owner's extreme hardship in detail, then mention Tesla in one sentence "a few paragraphs later"?
It's quite a mystery. You tell me.
Biggest issues would be people like Mary Smith. How many Mary Smith's exist?Technical question, couldn't Twitter just implement unique ID's and screen names, including blocking visually similar substitutions like 0 for O and 1 for l to completely stop fake accounts? Why even allow screen names that are different from account names?
Technical question, couldn't Twitter just implement unique ID's and screen names, including blocking visually similar substitutions like 0 for O and 1 for l to completely stop fake accounts? Why even allow screen names that are different from account names?
Emails have to be unique, why not Twitter IDs? Mary Smith1, Mary Smith2, etc.Biggest issues would be people like Mary Smith. How many Mary Smith's exist?
Same reply. I can't have the same email address as someone else.Not really. It's like the age-old problem of fighting SPAM. The target is constantly moving.
Emails have to be unique, why not Twitter IDs? Mary Smith1, Mary Smith2, etc.
Same reply. I can't have the same email address as someone else.
I can't say I've ever had a spoofed email that didn't have a unique identifier which was different from the legitimate one.Emails are not really unique, there are so many ways to game that system, it's why SPAM persists. It's easy to send an email "as" someone else, it's called spoofing, and while you can tighten up SPAM filtering to compensate for it, doing so also increases the false positive rate of blocking legitimate emails.
Thank you. Next time I'll defer judgment until I read the whole article, instead of relying on excerpts and reviews posted here by fellow fanboys.Um. It’s not even faintly a mystery Because the WHOLE STORY was about EV ownership spreading to less expensive vehicles -- and buyers able to afford 20,000-30,000 after incentives etc... It wasn’t about the Tesla, Mercedes BMW price point. It was about how the market has made a leap to a new and much larger tier of buyer.
It’s good news. And it DID note the important fact that once issue that continues to constrain the Id4 etc is lack of a reliable charging network, meanwhile it notes Tesla owners have confidence in theirs.
I see ZERO upside for Elon to go even within 10 feet of that persona/ engage in a twitter discussion. No sane CEO would do that ... but then again... it's Elon
just clear out your cache and you can usually read a couple more. It is also the house of Ross Douthat, Brett Stephens and David Brooks. You may find the first two more reasonable.Thank you. Next time I'll defer judgment until I read the whole article, instead of relying on excerpts and reviews posted here by fellow fanboys.
The trouble this time was that the article is paywalled and I can't bring myself to support the house of Broder.
thank you. I just don't get it why Elon needs to get personally involved in every HOT TOPIC controversial issues and voice his opinion while he is seen as "the face of Tesla / Twitter and Space X". Zero upside and potentially harmful to the brands...We agree upon something.
thank you. I just don't get it why Elon needs to get personally involved in every HOT TOPIC controversial issues and voice his opinion while he is seen as "the face of Tesla / Twitter and Space X". Zero upside and potentially harmful to the brands...
thank you. I just don't get it why Elon needs to get personally involved in every HOT TOPIC controversial issues and voice his opinion while he is seen as "the face of Tesla / Twitter and Space X". Zero upside and potentially harmful to the brands...
He can believe in free speech, but not hang around and amplify conspiracy theory nut job people. Even today amplifying people being critical of Kyle Rittenhouse tweet are bots because they dont have blue checkmarks. For F's sake Blue Checkmark verification was only released on iPhone anyway. I also believe that it is suspended anyway. Then throw in people like me who think the whole idea is dumb, and I wont purchase it just because I believe in Tesla and SpaceX like a lot of other Elon supporters do.thank you. I just don't get it why Elon needs to get personally involved in every HOT TOPIC controversial issues and voice his opinion while he is seen as "the face of Tesla / Twitter and Space X". Zero upside and potentially harmful to the brands...
yeah. the "non verified = bot" is laughable. i bought the verification just to see if it changes anything for me... experience, reach, interactions, ads... and no... not really. immediately cancelled so I'm only paying for this one month. I'm certainly not a bot only because i don't want to pay ~$100/ year for something i dont valueHe can believe in free speech, but not hang around and amplify conspiracy theory nut job people. Even today amplifying people being critical of Kyle Rittenhouse tweet are bots because they dont have blue checkmarks. For F's sake Blue Checkmark verification was only released on iPhone anyway. I also believe that it is suspended anyway. Then throw in people like me who think the whole idea is dumb, and I wont purchase it just because I believe in Tesla and SpaceX like a lot of other Elon supporters do.
Just saw this on Twitter, looks like they're making tweet versioning a thing:
View attachment 870665
Aren't they both the same?