Welcome to Tesla Motors Club
Discuss Tesla's Model S, Model 3, Model X, Model Y, Cybertruck, Roadster and More.
Register

2024 US model Y rwd battery type and size

This site may earn commission on affiliate links.
2024 MY RWD - ~ Panasonic NCA 2170 79kwh locked at ~67kwh - charging speed locked at 160kw - standard audio - 32A onboard charger?
2023 MY RWD - ~ LG NCA 2170 78kwh locked at ~70kwh - charging speed not locked ~220kw - premium audio - 48A onboard charger

arguably, the Panasonic cells are better than LG cells. But it is weird that tesla locked its charging speed.
 
2024 MY RWD - ~ Panasonic NCA 2170 79kwh locked at ~67kwh - charging speed locked at 160kw - standard audio - 32A onboard charger?
2023 MY RWD - ~ LG NCA 2170 78kwh locked at ~70kwh - charging speed not locked ~220kw - premium audio - 48A onboard charger

arguably, the Panasonic cells are better than LG cells. But it is weird that tesla locked its charging speed.
correction - 2023 MY RWD most likely uses LG NMC cells. 2024 MY RWD Panasonic cells are likely NCA.
I guess NCA cells have higher thermal runway risks, so tesla limited its charging speed. But NCA cells should provide better accelleration.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: mborkow
correction - 2023 MY RWD most likely uses LG NMC cells. 2024 MY RWD Panasonic cells are likely NCA.
I guess NCA cells have higher thermal runway risks, so tesla limited its charging speed. But NCA cells should provide better accelleration.
WRT acceleration, 0-60 mph is the same (spec) for 2023 and 2024 RWD Model Y (though that doesn’t mean you are wrong and they simply didn’t update the spec just like they didn’t update the spec for the range/battery pack that are in each vehicle).
 
Also worth noting that hand calculations of (407 city, 355 highway) so 0.55*city+0.45*highway times 0.7 gives a range of 268, so it seems that the range is probably substantially understated unless I am missing something. Back in the day of the 0.75 scalar this would have given nearly 290 mile range!
This seemed to be the case.
I would guess it ends up being a bit more efficient than the early-2023 LFP version just based on past EPA docs but someone would have to verify that.
I did not watch the video. (I checked...actually LFP and NCA are near identical in Charge-Depleting Highway, 187-188Wh/mi (remember these are super slow highway tests). Five-cycle results not published for 2024 NCA RWD.)
it does not make sense for tesla to software limit charging speed.

Agreed: that would just cause artificial congestion at super chargers.
Yet, that is what they do. About a 160kW limit but without tapering until a bit below 50%. Just costs a couple minutes or so at most up to just below 50%.

Is this summary correct?:

Early-2024 MY RWD: Panasonic 2170L NCA, 66-67kWh capacity limit, 48A OBC, ~160kW Supercharging limit, just a capped version of regular LR curve. (OBC= On-board charger)
Late-2023 MY RWD: LG 2170 NMCA, ~70kWh capacity limit, 48A OBC, ~250kW (?) Supercharging limit (any curves available?). <= Perhaps the best car ever.
Early-2023 MY RWD: LFP. (Not of interest here.)
 
Last edited:
Early-2024 MY RWD: Panasonic 2170L NCA, 66-67kWh capacity limit, 48A OBC, ~160kW Supercharging limit, just a capped version of regular LR curve. (OBC= On-board charger)
Late-2023 MY RWD: LG 2170 NMCA, ~70kWh capacity limit, 48A OBC, ~250kW (?) Supercharging limit (any curves available?). <= Perhaps the best car ever.

The little difference in battery should not matter in real world driving experience.
But 2023 MY RWD has 11 speakers 2 amps premium audio, 2024 MY RWD no longer has premium audio. This really sucks for 2024 buyers.
 
Probably addressed in thread, but all the Model Y RWD vehicles are safe to charge to and rest at 100%, because that state is below the battery's true capacity?

Considering buying a Y for my parents who absolutely do not care about performance, or AWD (in the South), but I wouldn't want them to even need to think about charging limit management.
 
though 60-0 might be
Agreed, 60-0 is more important than 0-60 to the majority of the MY RWD buyers. M3P buyers probably care more about 0-60.
Not being grumpy, just trying to point out the market segmentations of MY RWD- living in the city, not young anymore, care about family safety more than speed, don't need the "dual motor" badge just to show off, lol
 
Agreed, 60-0 is more important than 0-60 to the majority of the MY RWD buyers. M3P buyers probably care more about 0-60.
Not being grumpy, just trying to point out the market segmentations of MY RWD- living in the city, not young anymore, care about family safety more than speed, don't need the "dual motor" badge just to show off, lol
Spot on: for $38k I got all the safety, utility, access to charging network that every Model Y gets. Since RWD’s battery is also above spec (10% for 2024 and 15% for 2023) and slightly more efficient than the LR (since it weighs 200 lbs less) I also got very good range for the money (around 290 miles rather than the stated 260). My brother (single guy) can’t understand why I didn’t get the MYP; I tried explaining to him that the only girl I’m trying to pick up in my car is my daughter to take her to swim class…but he just shakes his head.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Honda Convert
The little difference in battery should not matter in real world driving experience.
But 2023 MY RWD has 11 speakers 2 amps premium audio, 2024 MY RWD no longer has premium audio. This really sucks for 2024 buyers
Don't want to hijack a "battery" thread, but...What "sucks", is that they don't let you know when making your decision. I think RWD owners wouldn't mind paying the extra for what they heard when test driving the (only dual motors in my area) car. Dumb deletion IMO.