JRP3
Hyperactive Member
I didn't even see any "people familiar with" quoted as sources.
-
Want to remove ads? Register an account and login to see fewer ads, and become a Supporting Member to remove almost all ads.
- Status
JRP3
Hyperactive Member
No, an out of control SEC, likely under pressure from external sources, tripped over themselves trying to trump up a weak case. The board had nothing to do with this event.
Thank you for posting this. I’ve watched several of Ron’s interviews on Tesla. Never saw him this excited about it.
No what got him in trouble was a few stupid tweets. Period.
bdy0627
Active Member
Maybe, or there could be a lot of covering going on AH by shorts to reload for tomorrow. It looked like the $300ish level had solid support today, so my guess is a MMD tomorrow will fail. But, they will still try.
There is nothing in the settlements giving the SEC, or court, any control over the selection. They just have to be "independent".
X Fan
Active Member
+1.....UK newspaper actions under his watch should have precluded any Board position. Politically, he is the antithesis of his Dad....he has that.
Seeing Murdoch proposed as chairman in an article that is so anonymously confident about the board’s thinking seems like a dead giveaway to me. Maybe Murdoch infiltrated the board and is strategically trying to influence the media narrative to dilute Elon’s influence. And it’s working.
EVNow
Well-Known Member
That's why you have Tesla in the first place - but don't have Fisker or Aptera or any number of other auto startups.
at the end... three people familiar with the boards decision yada yada
spoke in anonymity because the board discussions were private
and sonnenfeld and the columbia clown as commenters on the situation
more of the same smear tactics
eff em and everyone like em
bdy0627
Active Member
The NYT is very into editorial articles, and they are extremely biased. They still have some power and they seem to like to abuse it. As you mentioned, for whatever reason, they have a very stubborn disdain for Musk/Tesla, and their propensity to write propaganda against Tesla appears to have no limit. I can't stand them.
EVNow
Well-Known Member
Yes - but as I said, not as toxic as his father (apparently). I'd still say better than Peter Thiel, but worse than a few hundred CEOs of large companies.
Isn’t that is what is meant by the SR (standard or short range ) version vs the LR (long range ) version
Nasdaq futures are up tonight. Maybe we will have some macro support tomorrow to push us solidly over the $300 support level.
There were some consideration about warranty and supercharging making this Tesla Network idea not practical. And I just had the same idea that somebody mentioned above. If somebody is operating within the Tesla Network framework, then warranty can be extended with the same mileage, and free Supercharging credit can be allocated accordingly.
With regard to the minimum wage the possible driver could expect. How about considering that the drivers to be pseudo Tesla employee and allocate stock and option as part of the benefit? Of course I don't know what the current Tesla employee make, but just give an idea, say if you drive 1000 miles, then you get 1 share, but you have to hold for 4 year. 10,000 miles, then you get one OTM option.
What I mean is there may be technical difficulty, but I would still like to hear a fundamental obstacle, one show stopper, that Tesla does not want to tackle now. Maybe going through the legal proceeding city by city for the permit? But I thought about it, this still is something Tesla has to tackle down the road. So it cannot be the show stopper I want to hear.
I am guessing you have not read the complaints or Musk's settlement documents. Once you do you will better understand the situation.
Has anyone been able to find a copy of Tesla's Consent document? I can only find Elon's 7-page document. The Tesla settlement should contain more information about the required BoD actions.
RobStark
Well-Known Member
SR could come with mandatory non optional PuP,AWD, EAP, or premium paint that could increase the price above $35k.
So it could be Tesla starts making SR AWD PuP soon but leaves bare bones SR off the production queue for 9 months to a year.
So you have read the "Consent of Defendant Tesla, Inc." document from the court in New York. Can you provide a link? I would like to read it too.
i fear the foundation is being laid to stage a future coup. def nervous about who will be brought on and who will chair.
am i alone?
- Status
Similar threads
- Locked
- Locked
- Locked
- Poll
