You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Elon still appears at the annual meeting. I think that's fine. Earnings calls aren't supposed to be interesting.Good call… very tight and a lot to be proud of. Liked the tone and direction, but think Elon needs to join at least once per year… a lot of what was discussed was by the folks executing extremely well and understand the plan, but Elon introduces some intrigue and drama which I actually missed.
Can you tell us what these numbers are?Real fundamentals vs "next Tesla" fundamentals.
I used to think that getting the legacy automakers on board with EVs was essential. Earlier in Tesla's history, it was thought that perhaps Tesla's primary contribution would be to stimulate the larger car companies to manufacture EVs. Indeed, the Roadster helped motivate the development of the Chevy Volt and the Nissan LEAF.Biden has been tied to electric cars since his days with the ATVM loan program. To make mass adoption of EVs successful, he needs the UAW and the Detroit automakers to buy in.
Real fundamentals vs "next Tesla" fundamentals.
Can you tell us what these numbers are?
Cramer's new power house. TAN stocks. Tesla, Amazon, Netflix.
Tough and sad really, if I forecast accurately, for Pete. It’s a bit like Colin Powell (may he rest in peace) and WMD at the UN; taking one for the team and destroying his own credibility and ending his career in the process.Didn’t see this posted yet. Apparently Pete Buttigieg was quoted as asking Elon to call him if he has any concerns about the appointment of Missy Cummings - Buttigieg invites Elon Musk to chat after he claims NHTSA adviser pick is biased against Tesla. I'm of 2 minds here. First, this is mostly political - trying to douse the flames coming from a growing fire. And second, I like that there is heat around this. Maybe it will put a check on decisions made w/o strong facts. I doubt it will cause a change in direction in appointment though.
“You don’t know what you don’t know” applies not only to the technical part of FSD, but also to the regulatory part.Its pretty sad there are no clear regulatory goals for that yet, they just dont seem to be able to keep up.
There should be a standard set of tests to pass and a real world miles to accident rate etc
Consolidated Last Sale | $851.8 -14.00 (-1.62%) |
---|---|
After-Hours Volume | 2,070,471 |
After-Hours High | $875.4 (04:05:42 PM) |
After-Hours Low | $851.59 (07:59:40 PM) |
I believe that Elon needs to remain CEO in order to receive his compensation tranches, once these are done then this would be the moment to re-jig thingsElon wouldn't be leaving as Technoking, just as CEO. The whole reason he wants to step down as CEO is so he can focus on being Technoking. The only reason he hasn't done it yet is because he couldn't find the right person to be CEO, but Zach seems to be the guy.
Maybe Pete let the cat out of the bag with that comment....It was nice to hear Andrew from CNBC push Pete Buttigieg to answer if and why the administration has had an apparent "beef" with Elon and Tesla. Pete didn't completely answer the question directly and explained that they want to see all auto manufacturers succeed.
Would [INSERT GOVERNMENT AGENCY/EMPLOYEE HERE] be held liable for [ANY ACTION OR INACTION WHATSOEVER] in the US....Would NHTSA be held liable for excessive morbidity and mortality in the US when FSD is shown to decrease both in other countries?
So Fremont capacity is now 600k with room to expand and Shanghi is listed as >450k.
I've been assuming that Shanghi, Berlin and Texas will all have larger capacity than Fremont b/c green field design, larger footprints and no low volume S + X. I think that still holds, but starting to wonder what the capacity of those plants really is. 800k? 1m?
But he’ll receive another juicy CEO compensation package once the current one is complete, he will probably retire as CEO once he is ready to head to mars (Some time in the early 2030s I would guess)I believe that Elon needs to remain CEO in order to receive his compensation tranches, once these are done then this would be the moment to re-jig things
Probably, but the next package will probably replace the CEO clause with TechnokingBut he’ll receive another juicy CEO compensation package once the current one is complete, he will probably retire as CEO once he is ready to head to mars (Some time in the early 2030s I would guess)
It may not be about Teslas trajectory. It may be about changing the failing trajectories of traditional auto manufacturers struggling to come to terms with the fact they must completely transform into EV manufacturers.Maybe Pete let the cat out of the bag with that comment....
"All auto manufacturers" will definitely not succeed if the administration doesn't find ways to change Tesla's current trajectory...