The very same thing had already happened ~February of 2013, obviously before the “but, Elon Trump criticizes the media, you can’t criticize the media if Trump does,” game was invented.
Musk/Tesla had the temerity to call out the monkey business that John Broder had used to jump from his NYT energy sector coverage into a guest spot NYT automotive hit piece “test” of Tesla’s SuperCharger network (aside- the NYT’s automotive reporter’s review of the Model S several months earlier was glowing). Nearly all the media, from overtly for profit media to NPR, in lock step aggressively slammed Musk as a defensive ass for not just agreeing with Broder’s fabricated report and apologizing. It read very much like Musk was being shown the full force of punishment from the media tribe as a collective for not simply bending the knee for a member of the their tribe.
In fact, Margaret Sullivan, the NYT Public Editor who eventually acknowledged Broder’s piece was off (though politically/face-savingly watered down) included in her conclusion that her initial instinct was to simply take at face value a reporter’s claim over Tesla/Musk’s claim. Sullivan explicitly wrote that. It was only the fact that her brother happened to be very enthusiastic about Tesla and had reached out to her that led her to go beyond stopping at reflexively agreeing with Broder.
For those unaware of this- in the years since this incident, The NYT has 1) eliminated the public editor position, 2) promoted Broder to its editorial board.