Welcome to Tesla Motors Club
Discuss Tesla's Model S, Model 3, Model X, Model Y, Cybertruck, Roadster and More.
Register

Tesla, TSLA & the Investment World: the Perpetual Investors' Roundtable

This site may earn commission on affiliate links.
  • Informative
Reactions: Artful Dodger
Yea, so my question is what are the obvious improvements? And why, if 3.0 is sufficient ?
Lower power usage, future proofing etc.?
I think he is holding back to allow the others to speak.
I'm obviously no where near his level, but when I'm in a situation where I'm letting underlings (I don't care for that word) present something it's very hard for me to sit still and not jump in. Probably the same thing.
 
Yea, so my question is what are the obvious improvements? And why, if 3.0 is sufficient ?

The obvious ones I can think of:
- move to a smaller manufacturing process
- Reduce power consumption

And I'm sure they are learning things already for the software testing that they can add to the next design to make it more powerful and more efficient.
 
The NVIDIA Pegasus Self-Driving kit actually has around 130 TOPS of INT8, according to their website, but it does require 4 chips in total, I think likely at around 200W total power consumption. So Tesla's chip is clearly better, but not quite to the extent that they tried to make out. Maybe they are just out of date and haven't bothered to keep up on NVIDIA's latest stuff.
 
Kick-ass chip!

What surprised me is that they created not just a NN accelerator, but integrated it with a full SoC, video processing units and a number of beefy 64-bit ARM cores.

I.e. it's a full replacement for all Nvidia chips AFAICS.
Maybe one of their old chips. He said they only licensed a modest GPU as they (correctly) expected the need for post-processing to diminish as the NN improved.