Which random number generator was used?
Same one Jonas uses.
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Which random number generator was used?
Someone had a double colonoscopy, followed by a hemorrhoidectomy today1.47M shares traded in the past 15 min. We got a RUNNER!
New intraday ATM: $1,952.38
Cheers to the LONGS!
Nawrh, I like da guy that sold 10% of his TSLA yesterday (above $1900 no less!) because he herd there's worry ahead...I think we might have to hold a moment of silence for the TMC poster who opened 9x $1,830 - $1,930 straddle yesterday. That trade must be starting to get quite painful at this point.
Correlation is not causation. Looking at actual data apparently doesn't cause you to understand what you're seeing (although if you're lucky it's correlated). Perhaps you would do well to peruse the spurious correlations site. Actually, everyone would no doubt enjoy learning of the close relationship between the number of suicides by hanging, strangulation and suffocation and the number of lawyers in North Carolina.On the contrary, a split IS news, and the coverage of the topic is very poor. The AMZN reference is not relevant to this discussion and your suggestion is illogical (not sure which logical fallacy fits, but it's there, I'm sure):
Thou shalt not commit logical fallacies
As to why this DOES matter, well, let the data speak for itself:
Stock Splits - Research Says Stock Splits Beat The Market
The split stock group performed 8% better than the control group after one year, and 16% better after three years.
And:
Does a Stock Price Typically Go Up After a Forward Split?
Please advise if you feel the studies methodology were flawed or otherwise in error, or if you have any contradictory data.
Thank you.
Plunge of what? Plunge of OI or plunge of SP?Hugh OI at the $2000 strike price. Nearly there.
View attachment 578607
This is killer whales hunting in open water. Watch for the plunge after the Calls execute. This could be a strategy to accumulate b4 S&P 500 announcement.
Not sure but rob Maurer interviews Jim Cramer was post on the street around that time.10:45 ET
Hopefully, Giga Austin gets a week closer to making my Cybertruck.Well, tomorrow is the start of the 1 week "lock up period" (Aug 21-28) after which the 5 for 1 split will officially take place. Do we know exactly what's going to happen this coming week? Probably nothing, since there is no reason to buy or sell during a lock up period?
Elon was bullied as a child, and he won. Now he's spanking the shortzes. All the rest is Media lies. Don't you know this by now?Having grown up in a family ravaged by mental illness, I truly thought Elon
Not for TSLA it isn't.Umm there's a very obvious reason as to why people are speculating. Seeing a stock go up or down throughout a day, even 4-7% is nothing to speculate about.
Seeing a stock go completely vertical in the matter of 5 mins on very strong volume is very much worth speculating. Could be nothing of course. But what happened 20-30 minsa go was very unnatural stock trading action
Actionable advise, almost serious! We need to trace whoever came up with that explanation first and if it turns to be true we need to collectively hire this person as a trading advisor with huge salary and bonuses.This is the best explanation of his weird tweets I have seen so far!
FrankSG comes to mind just now, there are others
Does the pinned 'Great Filter' tweet stand for the S&P selection commitee?
I believe there is a good reason SP is held at 199X for so long. I don't think NASDAQ is prepared the TSLA Y2K comes so soon. They are actively upgrading the system to handle the potential system crash.So $1990 is the new $1890, boring!!! Get on with it!!!
It's a Mars colonization reference.
Horses not zebras.
Wow, there's a huge new hit piece in Forbes.com, but then there's this at the end:
Disclosure: David Trainer, Kyle Guske II, and Matt Shuler receive no compensation to write about any specific stock, sector, style, or theme.
How can this be true? I can only assume, given the vast number of absurd statements and assumptions in the article, that there are shorts involved here.