But Tidal is available on the console directly, as is Spotify. Qobuz, or Roon ARC for that matter, you would have to BT from your phone.Yeah I know that, Qobuz does as well. Thanks for the info!
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
But Tidal is available on the console directly, as is Spotify. Qobuz, or Roon ARC for that matter, you would have to BT from your phone.Yeah I know that, Qobuz does as well. Thanks for the info!
You think Musk selling shares months ago had a bigger impact on the October SP than for example the earnings report with significantly lower deliveries than expected?Well you can just compare it with the index right? You say it's a bad year for the market but the market is up in October while TSLA is down.
Thanks for the info!But Tidal is available on the console directly, as is Spotify. Qobuz, or Roon ARC for that matter, you would have to BT from your phone.
Mod vs Mod... I love it!Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
Quinam? Welllllllllll....
EGO sum vox clamantis in deserto.
Elon bad tweet factor of 10 x today's drop of 98 cents = $9.80That was months ago.
How much impact does that have on **today's** share price?
5%? 10%? 20%? 50%?
Please show your math.
Well look mate. You can't have it both ways. So before we continue down this narrative let me ask you.You think Musk selling shares months ago had a bigger impact on the October SP than for example the earnings report with significantly lower deliveries than expected?
These are definitely the only options. Checkmate.Well look mate. You can't have it both ways. So before we continue down this narrative let me ask you.
Do you think we are down 25% because of Elon?
Or do you think we are down 25% because the fundamentals of the company are messed up?
So you think the SP is completely detached from earnings and results?Well look mate. You can't have it both ways. So before we continue down this narrative let me ask you.
Do you think we are down 25% because of Elon?
Or do you think we are down 25% because the fundamentals of the company are messed up?
What am I missing in Nav without it? Satellite view? why do I care?Gotta be high. Music and nav is lame without it.
sat view and live traffic data, neither are really killer features.What am I missing in Nav without it? Satellite view? why do I care?
Ah, but no - merely helping out another brother in the trenches.Mod vs Mod... I love it!
Ah, but no - merely helping out another brother in the trenches.
Why do you answer my question with another question? That seems like a good way to not get anywhere.So you think the SP is completely detached from earnings and results?
That's a weird position to take.
These are definitely the only options. Checkmate.
This is a triumph.
Agree with your comments (I posted the link and quoted that particular part for interests sake - not making a good/bad judgement on it).Even if this is true, it is not big deal, in fact it is a standard operating practise that many use.
What Elon is doing is finding out what exactly is happening at Twitter, the state of the code, who is doing useful work, who knows what they are doing, who makes a useful contribution. In other words get the facts from people Elon can trust.
Any senior staff that work on important projects at Tesla will have a brief stay, and may visit for brief further reviews on a regular basis.
They will not be working extra hours (but they probably already work long hours), it is just a brief interesting diversion from their normal work.
The journalist thinks the split of staff time between Tesla and Twitter is news, but it isn't important. Technically if the Tesla staff are consulting at Twitter, Tesla should be paid a suitable amount by Twitter. If the time at Twitter impacted on their ability to do their normal work at Tesla it would be relevant, but the type if review I expect that they are doing at Twitter is not that time consuming.
This story is surfacing for 2 reasons:-
Once they identify where additional competencies are needed I expect Twitter will hire additional staff, and any current staff would are not making a meaningful contribution will not last long.
- Journalists are desperate to find something negative to write about Elon and twitter.
- Twitter staff don't like experts looking over their shoulder.
Some Twitter staff probably know that they don't contribute much, and hope that bleating to the media may ensure that they can keep their job.
The flip side is it will not be hard to find motivated quality people in the existing pool of staff at Twitter, and empower them to contribute a lot more.
It is important to establish very early on that technical staff can't afford to relay incomplete, inaccurate or misleading information to management, and if they try that, they will be found out.
I agree with you @JRP3 that the media that 1/2 the country tunes into has been sharing a pretty negative message of Elon lately - and that message includes a Twitter takeover that the left seems more concerned about and much more negative about. And the larger percent of early Tesla EV owners and TSLA retail stock owners probably came from that demographic. And I can certainly believe that a portion of those early retail share holders from that demographic are upset regarding the message they are hearing from the same media that originally encouraged them to buy those vehicles and helped make their decision to buy stock. And as you suggest, perhaps a portion of that portion are so loyal to their political attachments that they will look past the environmental benefits that likely drove their purchases in the first place and they will remove their TSLA stock attachment by selling their stock. Makes sense to me.It's a pretty sound theory that the CEO selling large amounts of shares to buy an unrelated company and Tweeting what many would consider rather questionable things could cause investors to lose confidence. That could lead to selling and/or reluctance to buy. I'm an example of both where in the past I would have been buying a dip aggressively. I know I'm not alone in this.
Do you think we are down 25% because of Elon?
Or do you think we are down 25% because the fundamentals of the company are messed up?
Big Money doesn't like uncertainty and a wild card in management, on either side. I think you are making a number of mistaken assumptions in your post but can't respond further because this will all likely end up in quarantine or deleted.And Big Money will be doing this only because of a far more favorable Levelized Cost of Energy for renewables - and that decision to make that transition to renewables will be 100% driven by the bottom line, and 0% driven by emotion.