Tesla hires GJ for Optimus ad …. Priceless
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Tesla hires GJ for Optimus ad …. Priceless
Tesla is philanthropyI thought the majority of the questions during the call today were good. The one from Dan Levy about Tesla's mission for affordable sustainable transportation vs industry leading margins and profits and pricing was fair. While I think most here understand the alternative of lowering prices and margins is bad for everyone because the product backlog is already approaching 1 year at these high prices, imagine the customer experience of waiting 2 or more years if they reduced prices.
Anyway, my thought after that question is how long before the anti Tesla media (most media) goes after Tesla with the greed narrative questioning "how dare they", and point to Tesla's record high margins while their compassionate altruistic legacy competitors settle for pennies....all to elicit their negative narrative? Mark my words, it's coming...
Shhhhh!Closing in on +10% pre-market
Closing in on +10% pre-market
I'd be curious to see the net impact on congestion. More miles driven for sure (not more cars in total) but also fewer accidents, fewer people randomly swerving on a highway (causing a small backup for hours at this spot) etc.BUT, traffic would then become a nightmare. Yes, robotaxis will reduce the number of cars in the world, but there will be way more cars on the road at any given place and time if it’s cheaper than mass transport.
over a ten year life cycle that feels about right.. numbers on this, at scale, should be stunning.Jon McNeill past Tesla exec saying positive things about this quarter on CNBC. Saying Robotaxi profit could be 250k each If done well.
Nothing like +10% premarket with a cup of coffee in the morning:
View attachment 796092
He and the rest of them should just keep doing it this way. I’m not interested in seeing a SP plummet because they are as equally bad modeling but from the other side by always over estimating.Looks as if the analyst Garrett Nelson tries to value Tesla like a traditional auto manufacturer building seasonality into his model.
He has $4.11 EPS for Q4 2023 and then for the next 3 quarters he has lower numbers of $3.22, $3.65 and $3.84. How would this be possible for Tesla?
FYI: Where he has $15.25 GAAP EPS for 2024, I have $33.69 (more than double his number).
View attachment 796083
I posted on Tuesday to the Supercharger thread.Yes there was contrary to a previous reply. Zack specifically said that supercharger build out had already accelerated recently and would continue to accelerate.
and you can see this in numbers in the quarterly report.
View attachment 796027
The clever part is where those 2170s are coming from, my guess:-
- Some Model 3s out of Fremont using LFP packs.
- Panasonic possibly making more 2170s at GF Nevada
- Energy storage Powerpack, Megapack, now using LFP - (the really clever part).
Couldn’t make the call and will catch up tomorrow. Was their any discussion on accelerating Supercharger buildout?
Contrary to what was said on the call, it looks like the rate of supercharger growth is not accelerating at all. If anything, it is decelerating a bit:Yes there was contrary to a previous reply. Zack specifically said that supercharger build out had already accelerated recently and would continue to accelerate.
and you can see this in numbers in the quarterly report.
View attachment 796027