No, they don't. They only have to support the warranty period.manufacturers have to support them for at least 10.
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No, they don't. They only have to support the warranty period.manufacturers have to support them for at least 10.
However, it is very difficult to find these articles easily. So my question is, do we have a site or location that tracks or links these?
I guess it depends where, in my country its 10 years, doesn't surprise me in the least that there's much less consumer protection in USA..No, they don't. They only have to support the warranty period.
I find Sam Alexander on YouTube does a good job of debunking FUD in the media.Hi All,
Still the weekend, so hoping this question not considered too OT by moderators. I used to post here regularly, but took a 6-month break from posting while continued to lurk on a few threads here. As you can see from my updated profile pic & signature - we now have a 2nd Tesla - red Model Y. Still HODLing a big chunk of shares plus trading options.
My question is investment and FUD - something that comes up regularly. Recently I got into a big argument/discussion with friends about tesla related FUD. This was about how any hint of negative news gets huge primetime coverage but the explanation/redeemption/FUD debunking articles are usually snuck in quietly without any notice. For e.g. the recent Texas car fire that killed 2 people. Initial reports were, autopilot, no one in drivers seat, car spontaneously caught fire, took 4 hours to extinguish etc. Reality - autopilot was not engaged, there was a driver in the driver's seat without seat belt, fire did not take 4 hours of continuous water dumping to put out, and now turns out driver was DUI.
However, it is very difficult to find these articles easily. So my question is, do we have a site or location that tracks or links these? It would be really nice to have it in one spot - the original FUD articles and later FUD debunking articles. I am sure there are several examples just this year - like that other spontaneous fire of runaway Model S where the owner was a hedge fund manager and lawyered up immediately. After making a lot of noise, they simply disappeared.
If we don't have a location, any ideas on creating a place to link these?
May be talking about different things.No, they don't. They only have to support the warranty period.
New car sales in USA (and elsewhere) are obviously down to shortages because used prices are going up a lot.
Perhaps support in a sense that they will continue to make the unique parts needed for that car for at least 10 years.No, they don't. They only have to support the warranty period.
thank you!One word; Cybernotatruck!
I think that’s one word. Seriously though; 6 seats and cargo space. Would be cool to have an option for flip up seats in the vault to make it an 8 seat config.
I think they do according to TSLA in Europe.Any of our European or Asian friends aware of FSD testing in Europe/Asia? NDAs for the testers, apparently:
Tesla Has Reportedly Begun Testing FSD Beta in Europe & Asia
Tesla has reportedly begun testing FSD Beta in Europe, which may hint at a new software rollout there by the end of the year, as CEO Elon Musk had previously hoped. The news is supported by the fact that Tesla has begun recruiting employees to test Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS) in...www.tesmanian.com
They'll probably get it done before end of q push considering they can build a hospital in 10 days.
They may do that, but in the US there is no requirement for them to supply parts out of warranty for any period of time.Perhaps support in a sense that they will continue to make the unique parts needed for that car for at least 10 years.
No, just good for brand loyalty. No one wants a car with shakey after sale support (cough, new start ups, cough).They may do that, but in the US there is no requirement for them to supply parts out of warranty for any period of time.
I love that line of thinking. When I look at my portfolio value, I like to think that at least some small amount of that $ came directly from the bank accounts of each of the lying scumbags Chanos, Spiegel, GoJo, etc. Makes me feel good to own their Benjamins.
So can we (Tesla) possibly expect yet another high margin revenue stream going forward as the lions share of the fleet begins to age and go off warranty?
Despite having lower repair/maintenance vs ICE; there are still parts that occasionally require replacement.
Uh wow Ford. Is that right? You need an additional 2,700 chips per car to make an EV?
There are many others who do an excellent job debunking FUD as well - Dave Lee, SMR, Rob Maurer just to name a few. In fact, this forum and the highly knowledgeable folks here probably are the best resource at debunking FUD.I find Sam Alexander on YouTube does a good job of debunking FUD in the media.
Help Fight the FUDHi All,
Still the weekend, so hoping this question not considered too OT by moderators. I used to post here regularly, but took a 6-month break from posting while continued to lurk on a few threads here. As you can see from my updated profile pic & signature - we now have a 2nd Tesla - red Model Y. Still HODLing a big chunk of shares plus trading options.
My question is investment and FUD - something that comes up regularly. Recently I got into a big argument/discussion with friends about tesla related FUD. This was about how any hint of negative news gets huge primetime coverage but the explanation/redeemption/FUD debunking articles are usually snuck in quietly without any notice. For e.g. the recent Texas car fire that killed 2 people. Initial reports were, autopilot, no one in drivers seat, car spontaneously caught fire, took 4 hours to extinguish etc. Reality - autopilot was not engaged, there was a driver in the driver's seat without seat belt, fire did not take 4 hours of continuous water dumping to put out, and now turns out driver was DUI.
However, it is very difficult to find these articles easily. So my question is, do we have a site or location that tracks or links these? It would be really nice to have it in one spot - the original FUD articles and later FUD debunking articles. I am sure there are several examples just this year - like that other spontaneous fire of runaway Model S where the owner was a hedge fund manager and lawyered up immediately. After making a lot of noise, they simply disappeared.
If we don't have a location, any ideas on creating a place to link these?