That's not my point. Will AP fatalities affect Tesla's bottom line? How will BMW fires affect their bottom line? Which company can absorb millions in lawsuit payouts better?
All of this snark about BMWs catching on fire when Teslas are self-driving under trucks and decapitating the driver are ridiculous, boorish and people just need to stop with it.
You'll note that the original "ha ha ha ha BMW catch fire HA" comment was simply a complete non-sequitur response to the comment that BMW has similar market cap to Tesla but has enormous profitability and delivers over 10X as many vehicles as Tesla does.
Just like IBM was enormous profitable selling expensive boxes and nobody got fired buying IBM. Their supporting engineer charges hundreds of dollars per hour as labor cost and the clock began when they leave office on their way to you!
Warren Buffet invest in it.
Now what?
History had hand delivered warnings to IBM, twice! The first time is right before the dot com bubble years when people begin to use multiple small computers for big tasks. IBM had a near death experience but they fully recovered because nobody can get the fleet of small computers working right. Ignoring this dire warning, IBM went on with its old ways raking in *sugar* load of money.
The second warning comes from a young company called Google.
Long before that, Dr. Lamport published this mystical story called Paxos. Long thought as fancy toy for academics only, nobody in industry thought Paxos is feasible at all. Engineers in Google had other thoughts. They successfully used Paxos to coordinate operations of tens of thousands commodity PCs and achieved the unthinkable. They unlocked the power of horizontal scaling, doing number crunching in a scale never seen before, without buying any expensive machines. They even published their work on many academic and industry venues.
Wise engineers in IBM took notes, they warned the management that this new technology trend may spell trouble for the future of IBM. So the management did something, they offered some cheaper models, connect them together as an HA solution, and called it a day. Luckily Google is busy using that technology for themselves, not selling them. So IBM sees no real threats.
Until IBM got hit by cloud computing. They really felt the pain now and started chasing from behind, wanting to use their profit from big machines to fund the growth in cloud. the problem is the big machine sales in the ditch now and they still can not compete with AWS or Azure on price.