What does homelink V do? Can it do more than 3 devices?With HW2.5 came:
Efuse
Homelink V
New Autopilot ECU
New side repeater cams
New triple cam
New Park assist ECU
New forward Radar
New B-pillar cams
New steering gear
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What does homelink V do? Can it do more than 3 devices?With HW2.5 came:
Efuse
Homelink V
New Autopilot ECU
New side repeater cams
New triple cam
New Park assist ECU
New forward Radar
New B-pillar cams
New steering gear
What does homelink V do? Can it do more than 3 devices?
I'll bet that would be a relatively easy retrofit, especially if it is just used for surveillance (and doesn't have to feed into anything for real-time processing).
I have zero interest in letting my MS drive itself around and pickup passengers for a small profit. Some days I cringe when my daughter gets in the car with sticky fingers and who knows what stuck to her shoes! If the redundancy additions between AP2.0 and AP2.5 are for regulatory approval for "commercial" use, I'm happy to skip it. Owning this car is just as much for the pleasure of driving it as it is for the cool tech. Get me to the state of the latest FSD video where car can do pretty much all of the driving with me paying less attention and I'll be happy.
Agree. There's already an aux power in the mic area that many of us use to power dash cam or for the recently added security package from Tesla. No big deal.I'll bet that would be a relatively easy retrofit, especially if it is just used for surveillance (and doesn't have to feed into anything for real-time processing).
The memories of AP2 not seeing stopped vehicles, veering towards dividers, etc are going to be distant memories.
Which would be exactly zero people. Is there some reason you're this way?They won't be distant for the families of the people who have been killed by this behavior.
Which would be exactly zero people. Is there some reason you're this way?
I'll bet that would be a relatively easy retrofit, especially if it is just used for surveillance (and doesn't have to feed into anything for real-time processing).
You care to specify which of those fatalities was caused by the behavior of AP2 as opposed to the failure of the driver to take responsibility for the vehicle as required? I look forward to you assigning blame correctly. Please use a method that's transparent and well-described so that we can check your work.Well this is awkward...List of self-driving car fatalities - Wikipedia
You care to specify which of those fatalities was caused by the behavior of AP2 as opposed to the failure of the driver to take responsibility for the vehicle as required? I look forward to you assigning blame correctly. Please use a method that's transparent and well-described so that we can check your work.
Well this is awkward...List of self-driving car fatalities - Wikipedia
You care to specify which of those fatalities was caused by the behavior of AP2 as opposed to the failure of the driver to take responsibility for the vehicle as required? I look forward to you assigning blame correctly. Please use a method that's transparent and well-described so that we can check your work.
As of the time of writing, that page lists three Tesla crashes; only one of which is after the release of AP2.
That one crash is the Mountain View crash, discussed for a few thousand posts over here:
Model X Crash on US-101 (Mountain View, CA)
Here's the preliminary NHTSA report, which is now more than ten months old, but AFAICT they've provided no update yet:
https://www.ntsb.gov/news/press-releases/Pages/nr20180607.aspx
From the discussion, it sounds like AP did steer the car into a barrier, possibly aided by bad markings, in full view of the driver for several seconds and while accelerating hard, with no driver input whatsoever.
A Prius hit the barrier a few days before at similar speed, and the driver walked because the barrier collapsed as intended. If it had been reset as designed or other protections had been added to replace it, it seems unlikely that this would have been a fatal accident.
I acknowledge the messaging issue.Tesla is using its customers -- rather than trained and supervised test engineers -- to test and develop clearly unfinished systems. And the fanboys all hail them as visionary and nimble compared to those old Detroit dinosaurs.
Is a Tesla in AP any less safe that the mutiple models/years of GM cars where the power steering motor would fail? Both require additional effort from the driver to maintain control, but at least AP disengages when you do.
Would the Prius have crashed if AP hadn't been on? Oh, yeah, no AP. The driver of the X had reported that intersection as causing AP problems something like 7 times. If I had an intersection with a known issue I would be hyper alert. I like AP but I'm not going to get on my cell phone or watch a movie, etc. while it is controlling the car. Do you think people haven't crashed on adaptive cruise control? AP is just adaptive cruise control with lane keep assist. OK, NoA is different but I think you get the idea.Would the person have died if AP2 didn't exist and the person didn't slam into the barrier?