Despite Tesla's shady practices, I simply don't see a better alternative. I'm not about to switch to an EV with no autopilot, even less range, and no long distance charging network over this. And I don't consider ICE an alternative- I'm done there.
I hardly ever supercharge, the times I need it I could very easily be accommodated with a CHAdeMO or Combo. Autopilot is not even a remote factor in my decision as the feature doesn't even work properly and is another one of those Tesla things that can get changed (or aspects taken away) without notice (it's still a Beta product, after all).
Bring on the competition!
If our Tesla has reduced that amount of range I’d be Ok with it. It’s still more range than needed considering the massive supercharger roll out here in Ontario Canada.
By association, then, you would be OK with Tesla reducing your range to that of your SmartED if it deemed necessary to do so for safety, right? Or disable your navigation system. Or curtail your acceleration to that of a Prius?
All of these examples live on the same slope. When does it get slippery for you?
Tesla has outstanding experience with managing battery packs.
Managing ≠ stealing
I drive a Smart ED with only 100km range in perfect conditions. I have somehow been able to drive 50000 km in 6 years. How did I get by with such low range. It’s a mystery. Guess I charged up every night.
You also paid 1/3-1/2 for your SmartED that most paid for their Teslas. I guess value and contractual obligations mean nothing to you because, you know, you charge every night.
Driving a low range EV and then getting back into a Tesla is an illuminating experience.
You wouldn’t feel so cheated and bitter if you realized range loss is a thing, and your expectations of gradual loss over the life of the car are not met, but that isn’t a problem, it’s just the nature of the propulsion method and technology of this age. Enjoy driving a car with 5x the range of my Smart. I do when I get in our S85.
Dude, you're talking to a room full of highly educated, well to-do people who likely know far more about batteries, EVs, and the underlying technology than do you. Your past ownership of low range EVs has led you to have very low expectations and standards. Don't foist that on us.
Regardless of your opinion, which is immaterial, Tesla cannot legally reach into someone's car and remove an item of value. That is theft. Period. Full stop. Whether this falls into that category is yet to be determined.
Get out of a thread that doesn't apply to you. Bye Felicia!
It is certainly not a felony, and the EPA rating applies to the car when it is new, not when it is years old.
Do you know of a single vehicle manufacturer who, through an intentional act, lowers your EPA rating after you buy a car?
I then was so tired of the drain I turned OFF data sharing with Tesla (Under Security Menu) and have not seen Vampire Drain for the last 15 hours.
Doesn't this also shut off a bunch of features, like traffic awareness?
I am thinking that Tesla is running all kinds of tests or collecting data related to that sudden loss of range?
After being updated to 16.1 or 16.2 (don't remember) at the service center, I did notice the fans in the front of my car and the entire HVAC system was running full bore to cool the battery on normal city driving, when it did not previously.
Yesterday when I drove my car down to 40 miles, my cooling system was running full blast as well when it didn't before.
I also notice that when I hit the Trip tab on the Energy screen, the grey (estimated) range line is significantly lower than actual. This means the vehicle thinks I'll arrive with significantly less range than actual. Prior to these updates, the estimated and actual were much closer together.
They REFUSED to print the results or let me take a picture of the results screen on their pc.
You should have whipped out your phone and taken a snap. Better to ask forgiveness than permission
I also wonder how this factors into the "unlimited" battery warranty, since a battery with significantly lower range than the rest of the fleet is no longer performing as expected and should be replaced?
Read the warranty. It excludes all degradation due to usage. Would this degradation be considered due to usage? That may be for a judge to decide but my hope for Tesla is that it does not go that far. All they have to do is just contact the affected owners and let them know what's going on. If there are so few of them, as Tesla says, then a few phone calls or emails shouldn't be a big deal.
It may be worth remembering that the battery capping issue (as opposed to slow charging issue) only affects, some, pre facelift cars with smaller batteries. So the numbers are always going to be a small % of the fleet. It would be interesting to know what % of pre facelift 85s and below, are affected.
How does one know if one is affected? Would we have to suffer sudden range loss? What if those of us who did not suffer the sudden range loss now suffer slow, gradual range loss as our batteries build up to the affected condition?