You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Refuel on the landing platform and then fly back for a base landing. That is the answer to a question that had been bugging me. I hadn't considered that solution, so I'm obviously not thinking far enough out of the box. The adventure continues.
like Spaceport America? (or, the Google search)I wouldn't be so sure of that. It isn't obvious that the powers that be will allow rocket tail landings anywhere near human habitation. Maybe SpaceX will be allowed to create a new spaceport in the middle of nowhere requiring the building of many miles of road.
I'm really surprised that flying back could be better than just steaming back to port on the barge and then trucking it. Seems to add a lot of risk.
X MARKS THE SPOT: FALCON 9 ATTEMPTS OCEAN PLATFORM LANDING
"At 14 stories tall and traveling upwards of 1300 m/s (nearly 1 mi/s), stabilizing the Falcon 9 first stage for reentry is like trying to balance a rubber broomstick on your hand in the middle of a wind storm. ". Can't wait for this attempt!
http://www.spacex.com/news/2014/12/16/x-marks-spot-falcon-9-attempts-ocean-platform-landing
When is this scheduled for?
Once SpaceX pulls this off, the economics of space flight are forever changed. And it's only a question of "when", not "if". They will make it work: if not this week then sometime next year.
I'm old enough to have watched the first Apollo moon landing live, and appreciated its significance: this will be just as exciting and as significant because the era of primitive throwaway rockets will be over.
There were no static fire yesterday, so that's unlikely.
Pushed out to Jan 6th at the earliest based on static fire test from the 16th. More details here: SpaceX</title>