You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Why would they do that ? They achieved what they wanted. Less new cars are registered which will reduce congestion. Their take is that the FRT exception regulated in more cars on hk streets.this gives time for the idiots at HK gov to reverse their FRT decision
Why would they do that ? They achieved what they wanted. Less new cars are registered which will reduce congestion.
Except the figures don't show that. Sure, EV registrations are down, but ICE registrations are up. Total registrations still increasing each month, so more and more cars hit ours steets (just dirtier ones).
Why would they do that ? They achieved what they wanted. Less new cars are registered which will reduce congestion. Their take is that the FRT exception regulated in more cars on hk streets.
Tax waiver isn't subsidy.
Waiver is, for example Hong Kong and Tesla, not taxing a product that has no market without it, and therefore no tax can be earned by the government anyway.
Subsidy is taking tax payers money to sponsor a purchase and that money eventually goes to the manufacturer, not the government.
When government officials use the words "subsidy" and "tax payers' money" on EV FRT waiver, it means they are basically A-holes, morons or both.
The forum is not intended as a battleground for "class" warfare and I don't bit&(&T and moan about my tax money goes to SUBSIDISE long hair's public housing flat. That is an example of SUBSIDY by the tax payers.
Long hair is entitled to public housing? He is paid close to HK$100,000 a month (+benefits, +allowances, etc).
less new cars? Last read TOTAL new registration of cars (ICE inc) went up.Why would they do that ? They achieved what they wanted. Less new cars are registered which will reduce congestion. Their take is that the FRT exception regulated in more cars on hk streets.
Also for model 3 the FRT advantage is still 100k which probably covers a good portion for a lower priced car.
that case was rubbished by the judges.Hong Kong’s shame: the wealthy who occupy public housing
Also think that we've vastly underestimated his income:
ICAC surprises judge with case against radical HK legislator
PS. Someone should ask for oil majors and car dealers' PR campaign fund allocations in HK.
that case was rubbished by the judges.
longhair aside the total EV FRT "losses" is far less than the 3 BS bridges to china (SZ Bay, the one to Macau, and the one at Fan Leng).
the total EV FRT "losses" is far less than the 3 BS bridges to china (SZ Bay, the one to Macau, and the one at Fan Leng).
Once he is out of job (ie, now) he'll be ok with keeping his flat. he spends all his money in ciggies and court fees so he's still eligible for public housing anyways.That's a fundamental difference, white elephants these infrastructure projects may be (though I'm hesitant to rush into a conclusion), money is being spent and invested into the real economy. For example, they created numerous construction workers opportunities, and those people toiled to make an honest living and support their families. For which I've tones of respect for and being a manual labor myself.
Unlike long hair lining up his own pocket for a selfish motive.