200 wide gives profit faster due to long decayI find the IC spread on SMCI is kind of Wonky, unless I go with a wide spread, else the Long can cost more then the Short
-
Want to remove ads? Register an account and login to see fewer ads, and become a Supporting Member to remove almost all ads.
Wiki Selling TSLA Options - Be the House
- Thread starter adiggs
- Start date
Careful with SMCI guys, post-S&P, I almost sold a -p1000 earlier, but decided was too risky, looks like that was a good decision
bmd00
Member
Have you considered establishing a rule to wait til the 1hr or 1day chart closes before making a decision?
I sold -1500c for $6, felt good.
I noticed several of these too, like no turn signal when entering the highway, and preference for LEFT most lane even when it was clear that other cars were doing 10+ miles above posted speed and the car won’t allow any speed ABOVE posted of that nature. I hate ppl like that (who get into the left lane and just lock it into the posted maximum) it’s dangerous for all OTHER drivers who will either tailgate (hate that too) or have to constantly move around them - passing on the right at speed - just to keep going at either their 5+ or 10+ speed often just with traffic.
Wrong thread, I know.
thenewguy1979
"The" Dog
what the expiration on those? Seem SMCI hit max least till next ER.
NVDA pumping while it went negative.
SpeedyEddy
Active Member
Sure looking good, volume-wise as well, so I'm crawling back in with shares and 2026 -P190 @ $54.09, again having "missed" almost 50% of the drop after selling @171-ish.
Friday, I already closed for 75% gain
thenewguy1979
"The" Dog
Dog got 2 TSLA, model X and Y, both with FSD. No update receive. That's warrant more downside in my book.
SpeedyEddy
Active Member
lost 10 dollar on +C SMCI DITM closed quickly
but won back 26.60 dollar on the opposite trade SMCI +P 1195
but won back 26.60 dollar on the opposite trade SMCI +P 1195
No rate change, but it’s more about the DOT PLOT for the balance of 2024
Well, turns out that waiting an hour to close them would have been worse....
ProfessorZoom
Member
When talking about robotaxi disengagement, we are only talking about safety critical. No one cares if a robotaxi needs an accelerator press because it's taking too long to think. That is part of an autonomous future. What you are talking about is perfect driving which no company will need to do that in order to be a robotaxi.One can assume lots of things. Doesn't make them true.
Very FEW of my own disengagements, for example, are to avoid accidents. Much more often they're to either avoid FSDb making an incorrect navigation decision (with no accident danger) or to avoid annoying other drivers because of weird non-human-like stuff FSDb does that wouldn't necessarily cause an accident.
If V12 is more "human like" I'd expect a significant drop in disengagements for myself even without changing the likely accident rate at all
Also this discussion probably belongs here:
AI, Autopilot, & Autonomous/FSD
Discussion about AI, Tesla Bot, Tesla Autopilot (AP), the promise of Full Self Driving (FSD), as well as other Autonomous Vehicles.teslamotorsclub.com
thenewguy1979
"The" Dog
Come on now. Who here buying?
look at Tim Cook running.....low IV....cheap call. That runup would make a bundle if bought Call last week.
look at Tim Cook running.....low IV....cheap call. That runup would make a bundle if bought Call last week.
Knightshade
Well-Known Member
If right now a lot of peoples disengagements are like mine-- mostly comfort/routing problems rather than safety ones-- and V12 fixes THOSE (but not the safety ones) then you'll see a large drop in disengagement while not actually getting ANY improvement in safety for example.
Whereas if most disengagements today ARE for safety, and you see a huge drop, then there is such an improvement.
But you have no way to know if FSDb disengagements are "safety critical" or not.
Thus a change in rate does not, inherently, tell you much useful about potential accident rates.
Especially when there's entire pieces of the system that do not exist yet to be able to be an RT (complete OEDR and an L4 fallback capability to name two). Right now the human is doing those tasks. We've no idea how well the CAR can do them until the car starts doing them.
Similar threads
