Now I re-read this, it's like I was kidding that I made that trade, no I did make that trade yesterday, rather I meant I was kidding to do it to stop the rot, but it "worked", as it always does, the moment I feel the need to do something nuclear, that's the moment not to do it, because it always reverses!
Anyway, it think flipping half the 100x -c175's to 50x -200 straddles was quite smart, if I kept the 100x -c175's and the stock goes to $200 then that's -$250k, with the 50x -c175/-p200 inverted strangle, if the SP stays inside the range, it's -$125k, so halved the maximum loss, but almost guaranteed that loss, well less if you factor out the 100x $6.7 for the initial -c175's plus 50x -p175's @$4.3, only around $20k absolute loss
So aside the inverted strangle, there's also 50x -p175/-c200 regular strange in place too, but these legs are relatively likely to expire, will look to close them out early if possible, and then that allows the possibility to 2x the number of contracts on the roll - for one side or possibly both sides of the invert will need to be rolled, maybe one side expires, who knows, but exposure is reduced dramatically
Does this all make sense...?
To summarise: 50x -p175, 50x -c175, 50x -p200, 50x -c200