BTC here, 4th round-trip, gained approx 3x than just holding. The volatility can be fun if you’re cautious and not greedy. As of now going into weekend flat on near-term CCs unless we test highs again.
Re-STO here 10x -C262.50 12/15 @$1.00
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
BTC here, 4th round-trip, gained approx 3x than just holding. The volatility can be fun if you’re cautious and not greedy. As of now going into weekend flat on near-term CCs unless we test highs again.
I've only written 30% of available puts and 18% of possible calls, so lots of wiggle-room if I need to add contracts to facilitate rollingThe Strangles are close ITM. Please share exit plan Max? That truly a big dog move exp 12/15
Got it. Basically rolling around the stock covered options and getting paid to do so. Thanks big dog.I've only written 30% of available puts and 18% of possible calls, so lots of wiggle-room if I need to add contracts to facilitate rolling
Well sold puts have a return which is limited to the premium you received, bought calls have unlimited profit potential
Reposting in case my question got lost in pile yesterday:
When TSLA is expected to rise, what's better for capturing upside, sold puts (-P) or bought calls (+C)?
And any NFA suggestions for strike/DTE on either?
"Better" is a broad idea!Reposting in case my question got lost in pile yesterday:
When TSLA is expected to rise, what's better for capturing upside, sold puts (-P) or bought calls (+C)?
And any NFA suggestions for strike/DTE on either?
A -260p is going to have a high delta and low time value. Winning with that will come from a share price move in your favor (rather than just waiting for time to elapse) - that's pretty aggressiveIMO, in keeping with "being the house", sell the puts (but as CSP, NOT BPS). If you think SP reaches 260 in 2 weeks, then sell a -260p instead of buying a +260c. If you're wrong about direction or speed, you can always roll it out and down. No such plan B with buying calls.
Re-STO here 10x -C262.50 12/15 @$1.00
Real example - today I BTC 60x -c240, what if I had waited, well now they're trading about the price I sold them for, which would be OK as they were hedging the -p240's, so break-even on those was quite acceptable. However, if wanted to roll to next week any of these would recuperate the cost:Got it. Basically rolling around the stock covered options and getting paid to do so. Thanks big dog.
A -260p is going to have a high delta and low time value. Winning with that will come from a share price move in your favor (rather than just waiting for time to elapse) - that's pretty aggressive
That being said I've used somethign like that to win bigly in the past. Pre-pre-split - I think it was a 1 year -600p that I sold when shares were around $430. Big up front income - I finally got a 2/3rds win after about 6 months.
Heck - if we get to another low point I need to consider that trade again!
Interesting that the “same confluence” moves up to $250 while max pain moves down to $225 for next week.Well, chalk one up for GEX resistance giving a decent edge again. SP held below confluence of highest OI, highest +GEX, absolute +GEX @$245. Couldn't be clearer.
As of now, based on option flow the same confluence moves up to $250 for next Friday 12/15. DYODD.
View attachment 997690
12/15
View attachment 997692
12/15
View attachment 997693
Yes, I noticed the reward to max lost ratio also is better when adding the other side. Since you get credit from both side and you'll always be "winning" one side thus the the lost is reduced. But it does add another layer of complexity in managing the extra legs in term of closing or rolling out. More so for me as I make them 2 or 4 legs to bound the max loss.Real example - today I BTC 60x -c240, what if I had waited, well now they're trading about the price I sold them for, which would be OK as they were hedging the -p240's, so break-even on those was quite acceptable. However, if wanted to roll to next week any of these would recuperate the cost:
60x 12/8 -c240 @$4.50 ->
30x -c240 @$8.5, so half the number of cotracts, already significantly reduced exposure
60x -c247.50 @$4.70, same nulber of contracts, but better strike
120x -c255 @$2.3, more contracts, better strike
315x -c265 @80c, maxed-out on my contracts, very nice strike, but no more wiggle-room if the SP goes to $270, etc.
Of course one is also playing the opposite side with short puts, which essentially doubles your money, halves the risk, as only one side can lose. With $5 taken for the short puts and calls, it allows for a $10 move above the call strike or below the put strike, so 230 - 255 is OK, although 240 - 245 returns 100% profits
Normally I do, but because I always sell one side, without safetynets, I only sell things I am at least a bit sure about. At the moment, MA4x divergence is in play, but I am not convinced enough about the direction to go full Monty, but I will, later. Monday is the third day, that presumably will be my land-mark day on which I possibly will start trades at maximum risk, like selling P260 and above, just a few months out and maybe even buying nice amounts of OTM calls, positions that nobody will advise to make and I will strongly advice NOT to copy. Maybe I will not even publish them, because there is nothing to learn (taking ridiculous risks..)and it goes beyond being the bank, what this thread is all about.Being chickened is the secret of longevity in this game….mmmm chicken
Sidelines - being the house is much more fun. Way less profit but way less risk and more consistent winning. All my sold contract for the week going into earning for Roku, LuLu, and GME are in green.
Tesla Stock posturing again. Maybe MM really want to weed out the 245C holder?? Little dog might need to bite the beast in the ass again to get it going.....
Magic 8 ball says, sounds bout right.
Magic 8 ball says, sounds bout right.