Welcome to Tesla Motors Club
Discuss Tesla's Model S, Model 3, Model X, Model Y, Cybertruck, Roadster and More.
Register

Russia/Ukraine conflict

This site may earn commission on affiliate links.
The helicopter losses picked up dramatically, does anyone know in what sector?

The stories I've seen said Bakhmut or Donbas. It appears the Russians are trying to break the deadlock with airpower. It's probably another sign of their desperation that they are risking their aircraft to AA fire to try and help the ground troops. The losses show that Ukrainian AA is still working.

What's to stop Russia from sinking the ships?

Sink ships that clearly belong to Turkey and that triggers Article 5. F-35s will be destroying everything Russian within hours.
 
Sink ships that clearly belong to Turkey and that triggers Article 5. F-35s will be destroying everything Russian within hours.
I'm not sure that is how the NATO Art 5 interpretation would work. An attack on Turkish civilian vessels in Ukraine waters (or alongside Ukraine territory) is definitely not an attack on the territory of a Nato member. And the defined sea areas very deliberately excluded the Black Sea (excepting, by my interpretation, the Turkish 12nm territorial waters within the Black Sea). If it were otherwise it would be (legally) very straightforward to organise convoys of NATO shipping to break the Russian blockade.

(imho ultimately Ukraine should become a NATO state, though I have a suspicion it is only likely to do so at the same time as Finland and Sweden also join. Which will be after this is over and Turkey/Hungary can no longer play both ends of the pitch.)

-----

Article 5

The Parties agree that an armed attack against one or more of them in Europe or North America shall be considered an attack against them all and consequently they agree that, if such an armed attack occurs, each of them, in exercise of the right of individual or collective self-defence recognised by Article 51 of the Charter of the United Nations, will assist the Party or Parties so attacked by taking forthwith, individually and in concert with the other Parties, such action as it deems necessary, including the use of armed force, to restore and maintain the security of the North Atlantic area.

Any such armed attack and all measures taken as a result thereof shall immediately be reported to the Security Council. Such measures shall be terminated when the Security Council has taken the measures necessary to restore and maintain international peace and security .


Article 6 1

For the purpose of Article 5, an armed attack on one or more of the Parties is deemed to include an armed attack:

  • on the territory of any of the Parties in Europe or North America, on the Algerian Departments of France 2, on the territory of Turkey or on the Islands under the jurisdiction of any of the Parties in the North Atlantic area north of the Tropic of Cancer;
  • on the forces, vessels, or aircraft of any of the Parties, when in or over these territories or any other area in Europe in which occupation forces of any of the Parties were stationed on the date when the Treaty entered into force or the Mediterranean Sea or the North Atlantic area north of the Tropic of Cancer.
=============

Regarding Russian aviation losses I may be misunderstanding the date, but yesterday's Ukraine General Staff sitrep did not include the losses being discussed. It did however include a truly staggering and increasing ongoing Russian KIA loss rate of 910 which is in keeping with the 9 tanks and 23 APC losses noted. That is also plausible given that the Russians are advancing across Ukraine defensive positions in the Bakhmut area.

(Perhaps these aviation losses will turn up in tomorrows data, or maybe they are older ones).

1674640597989.png
 
Last edited:
About f'ing time!

Lt.Gen (ret) Mark Hertling estimates it will take 6-8 mths before M1 Abrams reaches the front in Ukraine. He also says Leopard2 could be operational in 1-2 mths. It's all about the time.

"Get there the firstest with the mostest" -- Nathan Bedford Forrest​


Right now, some U.S. Army logistics Officer is calculating the amount of ammo they'll need to provision for the Ukrainian counterattack. My estimate is 80,000 rds of APFSDS needed for victory. At ~100 lbs per round, that's about 40K tons of ammo. That will require about 1,000 truck loads to deliver that ammo to the front. And that's just the main gun ammo.

U.S. Logistics will be required to make this work, on top of everything that European partners are already planning. This will require a major effort.
 
U.S. Logistics will be required to make this work, on top of everything that European partners are already planning. This will require a major effort.
There are apparently a lot of French bridges going in to replace damaged ones. Also from Sweden, Norway, Chzech. I have read that these are 100-tonne rated but I don't read that in any of the press releases. However if one goes to the company website the photos make it quite clear that they can take a 70t MBT.





 
I'm not sure that is how the NATO Art 5 interpretation would work. An attack on Turkish civilian vessels in Ukraine waters (or alongside Ukraine territory) is definitely not an attack on the territory of a Nato member. And the defined sea areas very deliberately excluded the Black Sea (excepting, by my interpretation, the Turkish 12nm territorial waters within the Black Sea). If it were otherwise it would be (legally) very straightforward to organise convoys of NATO shipping to break the Russian blockade.

(imho ultimately Ukraine should become a NATO state, though I have a suspicion it is only likely to do so at the same time as Finland and Sweden also join. Which will be after this is over and Turkey/Hungary can no longer play both ends of the pitch.)

-----

Article 5

The Parties agree that an armed attack against one or more of them in Europe or North America shall be considered an attack against them all and consequently they agree that, if such an armed attack occurs, each of them, in exercise of the right of individual or collective self-defence recognised by Article 51 of the Charter of the United Nations, will assist the Party or Parties so attacked by taking forthwith, individually and in concert with the other Parties, such action as it deems necessary, including the use of armed force, to restore and maintain the security of the North Atlantic area.

Any such armed attack and all measures taken as a result thereof shall immediately be reported to the Security Council. Such measures shall be terminated when the Security Council has taken the measures necessary to restore and maintain international peace and security .


Article 6 1

For the purpose of Article 5, an armed attack on one or more of the Parties is deemed to include an armed attack:

  • on the territory of any of the Parties in Europe or North America, on the Algerian Departments of France 2, on the territory of Turkey or on the Islands under the jurisdiction of any of the Parties in the North Atlantic area north of the Tropic of Cancer;
  • on the forces, vessels, or aircraft of any of the Parties, when in or over these territories or any other area in Europe in which occupation forces of any of the Parties were stationed on the date when the Treaty entered into force or the Mediterranean Sea or the North Atlantic area north of the Tropic of Cancer.

You may be right. I guess the Tropic of Cancer clause is why the Falklands War didn't trigger Article 5.

=============

Regarding Russian aviation losses I may be misunderstanding the date, but yesterday's Ukraine General Staff sitrep did not include the losses being discussed. It did however include a truly staggering and increasing ongoing Russian KIA loss rate of 910 which is in keeping with the 9 tanks and 23 APC losses noted. That is also plausible given that the Russians are advancing across Ukraine defensive positions in the Bakhmut area.

(Perhaps these aviation losses will turn up in tomorrows data, or maybe they are older ones).

View attachment 899603

The air losses are recorded the day before this one. I also note that the Russians not only lost 910 personnel, but also 23 APVs, 9 tanks, and 23 soft vehicles. The Russians tried something and got hit hard.

If you want to see the losses for a specific day, this is a good site for the data
https://www.mil.gov.ua/en/

This is good for pattern analysis
Tracking Russia's losses in Ukraine

The Russians are averaging over 5000 dead a week now. That's staggering losses for an army with about 100K-200K troops committed. I've read that Wagner has essentially burned through all the prisoners they could get into uniform and they are essentially a spent force at this point.

The vehicle losses haven't been high lately. Russia has mostly been holding back vehicles and sending in unsupported infantry. But just looking at the vehicle losses for the war.

The Russians started the war with about 3000 active gun artillery, a bit over 1000 rocket artillery systems active, about 3600 tanks active, and somewhere a bit over 10,000 APVs. They had a lot of everything in reserve, but it's obvious they have tapped their reserves pretty deeply. The above losses probably don't count equipment that is still in Russian possession but is useless due to mechanical breakdowns. Considering how bad Russian maintenance is and how some of that equipment has been in heavy combat for almost a year, a lot of it is worn out or pretty close to worn out.

That's especially true of the gun artillery. Barrels have a limited life and very few of their guns had new barrels at the beginning of this war. Russian artillery has been reported to be horribly inaccurate, a "good" artillery crew is one that can take out an enemy vehicle with 200 rounds or less. The inaccuracy is probably partially due to poor training and/or primitive aiming equipment, but it's also due to barrel wear. A barrel warped a couple of degrees will still shoot, but the round won't land anywhere near it's intended target.

The Ukrainians have been using the NATO artillery so hard that they have been wearing out their barrels too, but NATO has spare barrels and they have been replacing them in rehab shops in eastern Europe. Most Ukrainian artillery crews using western artillery hit their target within 3 rounds. Western artillery is designed to be efficient with ammunition use.

There are apparently a lot of French bridges going in to replace damaged ones. Also from Sweden, Norway, Chzech. I have read that these are 100-tonne rated but I don't read that in any of the press releases. However if one goes to the company website the photos make it quite clear that they can take a 70t MBT.






They were probably designed with Leopards, Abrams, and Challengers in mind. Bridges like that are much more important on offense than on defense. That's another indication the west is giving Ukraine what it needs to go over onto offense.
 
I like to catch up on German daily news with Die Tagesschau on Das Erste. Would you be able to recommend any other broadcast/streaming German language news?

Deutsche Welle is available in the U.S. too, but it seems to be a bit oriented to an international audience whereas Tagesschau is for domestic consumption alone and nice to get that perspective.
There is also "heute" on zdf.de , additionally there is ntv.de , which is a commercial news channel and there is orf.at , which is the Austrian public TV channel. There are probably more, but I personally don't use news streaming channels that often
 
Confirmed that Germany will itself send 14 Leopard 2 to Ukraine plus authorise release of other countries


===

Reading between the lines over the last few months there may not have been a fully joined up command on the Ukraine side in the Bakhmut-Soledar area.



===

Oh, and UK not always covering itself in glory. Frankly this stinks :

 
Could that be a Griffin as in the Swedish JAS 39 Griffin (Gripen in Swedish)?... Griffins supposedly have the cat body of a lion, and the one pictured here seems to be a leopard... But given recent events the leopard part does seem pretty self-explanatory... Maybe Sweden will transfer some Gripens, and Norway, Denmark and maybe even Germany will cover Sweden with their Air Forces like that other country did with Slovakia when Slovakia transfered their Mig-29s...

EDIT: Or maybe it's an American Eagle as in the F-15...

EDIT 2: Remembered that the F-16 was/is called the Fighting Falcon... And the F-16 does seem to have been the default bet this far...


Credit goes to (in Swedish):
 
Last edited:
An overview of tank supplies to Ukraine right now:

Confirmed:
🇬🇧14 Challenger 2
🇵🇱14 Leopard 2A4
🇩🇪14 Leopard 2A6

Awaiting full confirmation:
🇵🇹4 Leopard 2A6
🇪🇸 20-53 Leopard 2A4
🇺🇸30 Abrams M1
🇳🇴8 Leopard 2A4
🇫🇮 14 Leopard 2A4/6

Discussing:
🇳🇱18 Leopard 2A6
🇩🇰6 Leopard 2A5/7
Also an unknown amount of 🇫🇷 Leclerc.

per

From German announcements:
The goal is to quickly assemble two tank battalions with Leopard 2 tanks for Ukraine. As a first step, Germany will provide a company of 14 Leopard-2 A6 tanks from Bundeswehr stocks. Other European partners will in turn hand over Leopard-2 tanks. Training of the Ukrainian crews is to begin rapidly in Germany. In addition to training, the package will also include logistics, ammunition and maintenance of the systems.

Two tank battalions would be 2 x 44 = 88 Leopards. If one adds up the Confirmed + Awaiting + Discussing that gets to approximately that amount. To which should be added 14 Challengers + 30 Abrams + ?? Leclerc. All with the corresponding logistics etc. There are indications of further quantities to follow but that seems to depend on progressing tanks through maintenance/etc cycles and training.
 
An overview of tank supplies to Ukraine right now:

Don't forget Morocco! :D

"Morocco has sent tanks to Ukraine to boost its counter-offensive against Russian forces, Algerian news outlet Menadefense has revealed. Nearly 20 T-72B tanks were reportedly supplied to Kyiv's forces, making Rabat the first African nation to send armored vehicles to the war-torn country." -- a day ago​

Morocco sends 20 modernized T-72 tanks to Ukraine as Germany ... www.military.africa › Army

This is becoming the foreign-aid version of a pot-luck dinner. All you can eat, Putine! :p
 
Ukraine has manufactured and sold their own version of the T84 to various countries in the 100's. Could Germany offer their Leopards to say Thailand in exchange for Thailand sending their T-84s back too Ukraine?

Hopefully Germany concluded that it's a lot better to send the Leopards directly to Ukraine. Thailand currently only has a score of 29/100 from Freedom House...

Don't know when the Ukrainian tank deal was made with Thailand. Hopefully it happened back when Thailand was a lot more democratic...

 
Last edited:
Anyone want to make a prediction on what Russia does next? No change in posture, further conscription soon, etc?

Getting harder for Putin. He does not want to draw more of his population into his war, particularly city folks like in Moscow and St. Petersburg where many so far have been largely able to escape reality. But if he wants any chance to mitigate his coming losses with the Ukrainian counteroffensive likely the spring and into the rest of the year, he would have to increase conscription/mobilization.

Even then Russian soldiers will remain poorly prepared/equipped. The current and potential resources in the West are much deeper.
 
If only the people in charge in Marocco cared as much about their own population...

They currently only have a score of 37/100 from Freedom House...

Egypt had free, open and fair parliamentary elections in 2012 after the Mubarak government collapsed.

The Muslim Brotherhood won 47% of the seats.

Islamist parties more radical than the Muslim Brotherhood won 23% of the seats.

Iran has a score of 14/100 according to freedomhouse.org

What do you suppose Morocco's freedomhouse score would be 4 years after the monarchy is removed and a government is elected in free, open, and fair elections?
 
Egypt had free, open and fair parliamentary elections in 2012 after the Mubarak government collapsed.

The Muslim Brotherhood won 47% of the seats.

Islamist parties more radical than the Muslim Brotherhood won 23% of the seats.

Iran has a score of 14/100 according to freedomhouse.org

What do you suppose Morocco's freedomhouse score would be 4 years after the monarchy is removed and a government is elected in free, open, and fair elections?
Tunisia is the better comparison methinks, so 71/100.

Also it depends to what extent people like Putin and his fellow travellers such as Erdogan and Assad (and El-Sisi) are emboldened to cause mischief.