My bad, I couldn't edit my previous post, but yes you're correct that power consumption include everything consumed while the car is moving.The data I've reported here is mostly with AC turned off (and heated seats off etc), because I've been trying to achieve actual miles traveled > rated miles consumed. I am definitely displaying rated miles, not ideal miles. I'm in Maryland and the temps have been fairly mild lately in the low 80's (F) so it's hot not cold, so there is no way I would turn any heat on.
I can understand how AC, heat etc while parked can be excluded from kWh trip measurement (because it doesn't count any energy towards a trip while parked or off), but I'm skeptical that accessory energy isn't counted while the car is driving. For one thing, when I do turn the AC on while driving, I always see higher average Wh/mi values and people on the forums routinely report higher Wh/mi figures for winter driving when they are using heat. For another, Tesla would have to separately meter the power going to the drive train in order to exclude all the accessories etc. In doing so, they would create customer confusion (like mine) regarding why their energy consumption is so low, yet their rated miles consumed is so high, so it doesn't make sense to intentionally exclude accessory power while driving from the trip power meter.
So since mine is a Japanese car and RM = 320Wh/m I can easily achieve RM and can go further than display. But I sometimes go lower than 290Wh/m using surface streets.
It could be that latest 70D uses lower RM number like 260 as it is very efficient; lighter battery with dual motor and improved aero with facelift. I wonder why Tesla does such confusing changes. It sure looks that the car can go further with lower Wh/m constant for RM.