You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It's an interesting video and some of his speculation seems reasonable, but I don't agree with his comments about inflation and rising costs being all bullshit and corporate greed. Supply chain is still an issue (I work in government Acquisition), and inflation is very real. While the lower income types he primarily talks about are struggling with the cost of cars right now, I don't see some massive reckoning coming. I was reading an article recently that talked about how the economy has impacted housing costs, and that the average payment of a two-story home in the US has gone from around $2700/month 2 years ago to close to $4500/month now, and yet people have just accepted that this is the new normal. Inventory still doesn't sit on the market. Yes, there are other reasons for this, but the fact is that people are still able to buy these homes, and realtors report acceptance on the part of homebuyers when faced with these new realities.Macro effects:
But inflation has flattened out lately and the last decision by the fed was to halt the rise of interest rates. I see interest rates being stagnant through 4th quarter and then starting to drop in Q1 and Q2. Once interest rates start cooling off, loans and big purchases start rising, which means demand picks up and supply dwindles. So I don’t see Tesla’s high end cars being any cheaper than they are this quarter.It's an interesting video and some of his speculation seems reasonable, but I don't agree with his comments about inflation and rising costs being all bullshit and corporate greed. Supply chain is still an issue (I work in government Acquisition), and inflation is very real. While the lower income types he primarily talks about are struggling with the cost of cars right now, I don't see some massive reckoning coming. I was reading an article recently that talked about how the economy has impacted housing costs, and that the average payment of a two-story home in the US has gone from around $2700/month 2 years ago to close to $4500/month now, and yet people have just accepted that this is the new normal. Inventory still doesn't sit on the market. Yes, there are other reasons for this, but the fact is that people are still able to buy these homes, and realtors report acceptance on the part of homebuyers when faced with these new realities.
One reason people can afford to do this is that salaries have gone up across the board by a massive amount also. So for all the low income/bad credit types that are ditching these beat up cars they can't make payments on (you know, the kind of people that are either duped into accepting the ridiculous interest rates they discuss in the video, or the type that are so bad with money they have no choice), there are plenty of people out there making 20% more than they were a few years ago sitting on cheap fixed rate mortgages.
I am not confident at all the higher end new inventory will see plummeting prices the way he claims the older models will be (which I do agree with), but I could see it having a lesser secondary effect. What I'm more worried about is that interest rates will continue to climb for a while.
But if the X loses half ($3750) or full $7500 qualification was it worth waiting?One additional thing to consider: starting in January, in the US the IRA tax credit becomes a point of sale credit—meaning you get it as a discount immediately when you purchase the car, vs as a reduction in your tax bill.
This is an additional incentive for the consumer, an item in favor of prices maintaining or increasing in January instead of going down.
And what sucks with this is that if you dont qualify when you file you have to pay the difference with your taxes.One additional thing to consider: starting in January, in the US the IRA tax credit becomes a point of sale credit—meaning you get it as a discount immediately when you purchase the car, vs as a reduction in your tax bill.
This is an additional incentive for the consumer, an item in favor of prices maintaining or increasing in January instead of going down.
No--just pointing out perhaps one thing that would help keep Tesla from lowering prices further.But if the X loses half ($3750) or full $7500 qualification was it worth waiting?
New video out explaining all the details of the 2024 Federal EV incentive...And what sucks with this is that if you dont qualify when you file you have to pay the difference with your taxes.
YouTubers are so f****** annoying. Can’t stand their clickbait bullsh*t. Especially the thumbnails. DoucheMacro effects:
This is how I look at it last year I owed exactly 9k in federal income tax in which I cut a check every year, so what that means is if the same liability this is the same , they I only owe the government $1,500. It simple math. You have to owe the government that type of money in order to the get the credit.
Yes, and rest assured dealers with begin to allow prices to creep up to suck up some of that tax credit or use the proverbial above sticker additions.And what sucks with this is that if you dont qualify when you file you have to pay the difference with your taxes.
I believe the rules for that has changed in 2024. Correct me if I'm wrong.
"The guidance also provides proposed eligibility rules for the previously owned clean vehicle credit that would give consumers more certainty regarding their ability to claim and to transfer the credit. The guidance would clarify that eligible consumers may transfer the full value of the new or previously owned vehicle credit regardless of their individual tax liability."
My interpretation is regardless of how much you owe the government, as long as you meet the income limits in MAGI in 2023 or 2024, you get the full eligible tax credit for the vehicle, not up to what you owe to the fed. As an example, if you only owed the government $3k in federal taxes, you still get $7500 off the POS for eligible EVs and you do not have to repay the difference back as long as you meet the income limits for the federal tax credit.since I purchased my wife MYLR in March 2022 & another in October 23, I should get $15k back from federal government and I’m u see in income threshold. That make no sense. The government is not going to cut you a check if you owe less than the rebate amount
I'm torn. I like it. The interior size is just a tad smaller than the Telluride and the ground clearance is poor (it's more minivan) and the 2nd/3rd mechanized folding system is problematic. With that said... it should ride nice, be very quiet on the highway, and charge fast. The interior is nicer than in an Ioniq 5 and EV6 - which is a bonus.
If the EV9 was $70K with 270 miles of highway range it would be a hit. Salesguy hinted well over $80K for the GT-Line I looked at. That's a no-go for me.... too close to Rivian and Model X pricing.
I read about that. It makes sense. Full sized 100kWh battery and only a single motor instead of two. Should be more efficient. At the cost of power, of course.
I was pretty intrigued with the EV9. The space and the practicality was nice but it once the specs were released it was a no-go.
I read about that. It makes sense. Full sized 100kWh battery and only a single motor instead of two. Should be more efficient. At the cost of power, of course.
Edit: I don't even know why Kia bothered to make those RWD models. 215 and 201 hp for the Light and Long Range variants, resp, is a ridiculous amount of power for what will probably be a 5500 lb vehicle. EV or not, I don't see them selling well at all. Luckily, the price jump to the AWD models isn't huge, but even those seem pretty underwhemling in an age of so many >400hp EVs. I'm also baffled on why/how going from the Land/Wind to the GT gives the same hp but more torque...