St Charles
Tesla, not TSLA!
Then what's your guess on the quarter mile ET?
10.80. I think we have already seen it.
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Then what's your guess on the quarter mile ET?
40 kW more but no better than 10.8? My guess is 10.7 but the MT "ringer" will do a 10.5 j/k10.80. I think we have already seen it.
Then what's your guess on the quarter mile ET?
40 kW more but no better than 10.8? My guess is 10.7 but the MT "ringer" will do a 10.5 j/k
40 kW more but no better than 10.8? My guess is 10.7 but the MT "ringer" will do a 10.5 j/k
I think that 312 was ideal not rated range. It was a brand new car and I asked him to charge to 90% and repost but crickets.I'll bet a taco that the 1088792-00-C battery is 100kWh. That's what TRC supposedly has. What FikseGTS tested was not the same as what TRC had and measured lower. Closer to what I and a few other of our 'V2' batteries have. You can further see this where both FikseGTS and I can't crack into 10's on these batteries where TRC could potentially snag a 10.7x pass. There is also someone who posted his brand new 'P90DL' had a range of 312mi. It's unconfirmed but the numbers correlate damn well.
I think that 312 was ideal not rated range. It was a brand new car and I asked him to charge to 90% and repost but crickets.
1071941-00-C has been measured at ~500kW
1088792-00-A has been measured at ~510kW
What might be more interesting is the full power curve of these respective batteries. We've talked a lot about peaks but the real story may be in how long these batteries can keep producing at a high level.
I saw a post that said a fully charged 1088792-00-A is at the maximum expected 4.2 volts and thus not a restricted pack havent seen a review or KW numbers off a 1088792-00-C yet though... you sure thats the right part number?
TRC car is the 1088792-00-A not C
and...
They're doing a full topping charge to 4.2 volts. That's using 100% of the cell capacity.
Each blue vertical line is the voltage of one of the 96 groups of cells that are in parallel. These 96 are connected in series to give the pack voltage of 403.2 volts.
So, no, these are not 100kwh packs in disguise.
Pack part no. 1088792-00-A
It wasn't just the charge voltage. It was the fact that the current to the cells had dropped to 40ma at this voltage. This is how you detect when the cells are fully charged. Your keep the voltage fixed at 4.2 volts and monitor the current until it drops to a predetermined value. So this means the battery was charged to 100 % capacity. If it had been a 100 kwh battery, they would have only charged it to 90%.
You can tell the cell configuration is still the same. There's still 96 bricks in series that give a 403 volt pack. Each one of the 96 vertical lines on the plot I uploaded is a brick voltage.
If you look at the chart the model s and model x p90dl share the same battery currently, and if you recall the model x has had more power for quite some time now...
Tesla Model X P90D is more powerful than the Model S P90D
I don't know what battery you have in your car but the car that fiksegts was testing has the 107 battery and trc has the 108... I also have a 108 and my box arrives today hope to add some results soon
Off topic question. Are you going to get a whole new P100D, or just a battery upgrade?looking forward to the results, at the track with the P90DL V2 with 107x battery, the vbox with within 2-3/100ths of the track ETs....
I agree, the Model S P90DL refresh was already at 512 kw (683 hp) at max. The P100DL got to be over 700 hp at bare minimum.1762 amps at 314 volts = 553 KW = 741 hp at the battery.
Tesla states that 45 to 65 mph is 1.2 second for P100DL.What do you think the 50-70 mph time is? The 2016 Rs7 is recorded at 1.52