The 100kWh is consistent with the EPA result for the LR (~101kWh) but a little too low to be consistent with the preliminary Monroney in the OP (~103kWh). But 100kWh would make sense, since the degradation threshold is 96kWh right now (your battery can currently degrade to 96kWh before showing any loss of rated miles). Still a quite large gap but more normal.
The original Monroney might have been a guess but I am still surprised it is off by that much (3%). I generally expected the error might go the other way because I assumed 88.5% efficient charging. And thought maybe higher voltage pack might have helped slightly with that.
Anyway we will see. It does make sense with a small reduction in losses with the new high voltage pack, etc., that you might make it slightly smaller and lighter.
The original Monroney might have been a guess but I am still surprised it is off by that much (3%). I generally expected the error might go the other way because I assumed 88.5% efficient charging. And thought maybe higher voltage pack might have helped slightly with that.
Anyway we will see. It does make sense with a small reduction in losses with the new high voltage pack, etc., that you might make it slightly smaller and lighter.