You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Agreed. Even the plaid and it's amazing power doesn't make up for that chassis overall sluggish and ponderous feel. Even MPP with their suspension Magic could not create a car that is as light on its feet as the Model 3 ' see Sasha's comments here: Remembrance, Looking Forward, And Plaid - Mountain Pass PerformanceSame. The model S is just too darn big for me.
But I love the tech and speed in it. Hopefully they update the M3P in the next year or two.
Maybe, the history of automotive design teaches us that even as new fabrication techniques and lighter materials enter the market that vehicles still tend to get heavier. The mass market doesn't care about light weight, they care about many other things. So the new Teslas may very well weigh the same but have more range or more safety or more room or more features or some of the expensive lightweight things may be replaced with cheaper ones, etc etc etcAnd being structural, these batteries will mean an even LIGHTER, FASTER, longer range M3P. I'll enjoy mine for the time being.
I'd rather have somewhat more battery capacity for track than weight decrease. Large battery can be used longer, charge faster, gives more power, can do better regen and overheats less. All that is now more valuable than marginal weight loss. Assuming Plaid motors and average power consumption after regen of 500kW - 20 minute session would eat above 160kwh of charge. You need 200kwh battery and above 500KW charger to be able to make it to the next round... We are not yet there.
I would trade off 10% more weight for 1.5x larger battery, 4x better cooling and 2x better motors without hesitation. Wider wheel arches are welcome too.Current MP3 battery is 82kwh at1060lbs. So if you bumped the mass of the car from 4000lbs to 4,500lbs you get 123kwh battery but now you need bigger tires and that will eat into some of the extra energy. Or you keep the car at 4,000lbs and hope that 4680 battery packs bump you up to 100kwh, which is also kinda marginal. If you just have a level 3 supercharger at the track you are pretty well off, even though not at gasoline track car convenience. The cars go from low to 80% really quick.
I would pay $100,000 (or perhaps a little higher) in a heartbeat, if Tesla offered the Model 3 with a tri or quad motor… as long as it can do 0-60 in the low 2’s.How much would you play for 4 motors, like what's coming to the Cybertruck?
4680 will easily address this...that is allI will start off by saying that I definitely enjoy my M3P and have no regrets about purchasing it. However, after a year and a few months of driving it, I have had some thoughts that I would like to share.
As background, I have previously owned an AMG C63 with the 6.2l engine, an AMG C63s with the twin turbo 4l engine, and a BMW M4. I enjoyed each of these cars to varying degrees and I will spend a moment describing their pluses and minuses. The 6.2l C63 was a classic AMG hot rod. The engine was amazing, but the chassis and particularly the comparatively skinny tires made for lots of drifting and burn out action, but only modest corner grip. Nonetheless,a really fun car for its day. The M4 handled pretty well, but at the cost of a fairly harsh ride (which I did not mind, but others have complained). The engine was nice, but definitely not amazing. The big downside was the traction / stability control. Literally, if it sensed even the slightest risk of slip it would intervene so forcefully you might think someone had pulled the emergency brake. Defeating the stability control overcame this problem, but I like a safety net, so I rarely resorted to this. Finally, the C63s also has a remarkable engine. While a huge leap forward compared to the previous generation C63 chassis, the car was still a bit heavy and the tires still too skinny. The car was predictable, and handled well within its limits, but those limits were a bit low. To its credit, the stability control was set up perfectly, both in terms of waiting until there was really a problem and in gentle and minimal intervention.
This brings us to the M3P. As others have mentioned, the interior is not really up to the quality of the above competitors, but it is comfortable enough for me and the M3P's lower price and higher performance certainly make up for any interior shortcomings for me. I am amazed that Tesla can currently sell an M3P for about $55,000 that outperforms those other cars on the street and on the track when they cost between $75,000 and $85,000.
I will say that for me, there is a bit less of a sense of excitement when driving the M3 at least compared to the 2 AMGs. Those cars felt less isolated from the road and gave more overall feedback. On the other hand, the M3 is considerably more relaxing to drive and much better suited for long road trips, particularly when using auto pilot even without FSD. Also, unlike the M4, I have not experienced an overactive stability control system in the M3P.
Sorry for all the prologue, but here is my thinking and proposal. Many car magazines have been reporting the imminent arrival of a new and improved BMW M3/M4 duo that will eventually include all wheel drive variants and that are reputed to have kicked up the horsepower from the low to mid 400 range up to 503. This suggests that BMW is serious about beating the M3P at the track and retaking the sport sedan crown. While less has been written about future AMG vehicles, I am certain AMG will respond in kind.
Based on all of the above, I think Tesla should offer a Super Sport (or Ludicrous or whatever) version of the M3P to stay ahead in the sport sedan race and to offer greater driving excitement. What would this include you ask (and I'll tell you even if you didn't ask ;-).
* Higher capacity battery - with advancing battery technology, Tesla should now have access to batteries with higher capacity than the current M3P battery, and, importantly, these new batteries should weigh no more and preferably less than the current battery.
* Higher capacity / power drive motors and circuitry - with more battery capacity (and higher current capacity) the rest of the drive system should also get beefed up to provide quicker acceleration and perhaps less fall off at higher speeds.
* More sophisticated suspension - In a world where Camaros, Mustangs and Corvettes have fancy computer controlled shocks and suspensions that provide comfortable ride, reduced brake dive, better weight transfer for acceleration, and flatter cornering, it is time for Tesla to step up and offer something comparable. Tesla can also implement variable ride height as it has with the Model S to improve highway range and high speed cornering.
* Better brakes - the M3P brakes are fine for the street, but given the range of higher performance aftermarket offerings, there is clearly room for improvement for cars that may see occasional or frequent track duty.
* True lightweight forged wheels - When I wanted a second set of wheels so I could have dedicated winter wheels / tires, I splurged for the T-Sportline forged wheels. The weight difference really is at least 10 lbs per wheel and you can feel the difference in front end response, turn-in and a generally more nimble feel. Forged wheels are also stronger, so other than cost, there is no downside here.
Given that the current C63s costs north of $80,000 in any reasonable configuration and that the new BMW M3/M4 will likely be in the same ballpark, Tesla has lots of price headroom to implement all of the above improvements and more while still undercutting its competitors' prices.
Perhaps the only thing holding Tesla back in this regard is a desire to keep the Model 3 performance below that of the flagship Model S. However, when the Plaid Model S arrives, that obstacle should disappear.
Well, that is my proposal. I will say that if Tesla takes me up on it and succeeds as I expect, I will line up for a trade-in.
I welcome all constructive feedback.
Peace
Of course, it does not need to be a $100,000 solution. This price is simply what I would personally accept and be willing to pay for a tri or quad motor variant of the Model 3, that would presumably have pretty much the same insane acceleration as the Model S Plaid (0-60 in about 2 seconds).It’s not a $100,000 solution. Right now , Tesla could easily bump up the P in the Performance with some general weight savings, ultralight forged wheels, and Electronically controlled dampers with adjustable, adaptable suspension modes. That really shouldn’t cost more than $5000-8000 over the LR model. It really shouldn’t be more than another $5000 over the current model where you don’t get a whole lot for the $$$ on the P model.
Is this something that's not currently offered by @MountainPass ?Solid rubber or much stiffer subframe bushings will be nice upgrade for less geometry changes and allow the suspension to work properly.
No, it's not. It's one of the weakest link in the suspension right now.Is this something that's not currently offered by @MountainPass ?
You are right, just looked the part up and MPP's website.No, it's not. It's one of the weakest link in the suspension right now.
If someone comes out with subframe bushing inserts, maybe 3-4 hours of labor. Full subframe bushings will be like 7-8 hours of labor. My shop has done a bunch of BMW E8x, E9x, and BRZs.You are right, just looked the part up and MPP's website.
How labor intensive do you think it would be to actually install such aftermarket part?