Zcd1
Active Member
I seriously wonder where all these people so concerned with 60-130 times drive their cars....
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Mexico.I seriously wonder where all these people so concerned with 60-130 times drive their cars....
Don’t think too hard - you may pull a muscle…but on the roadI seriously wonder where all these people so concerned with 60-130 times drive their cars....
Fast enough is exactly what I tell people this car is. I just wish it didn’t feel so much faster at lower speeds than it really is. I’d give up some low end to get better top end for the same reason that I prefer a stock E92 M3 to a highly modified and faster 335i or a newer M3. It just feels better to drive for fun.For most, their Tesla is fast enough. For the few, nothing will be fast enough.
Even more important to most drivers, is not the absolute acceleration, but the instant throttle response that allows them precision calibration of torque in everyday driving.
I’d be looking at other reasons if I’m trading. I want better top end but that’s not everything.What if they improve the launch and extract the extra 20-40 HP out of the current battery but they don't improve top end acceleration significantly over what is possible with a lightweight Model 3 now? What if it does 0-60 mph in 2.8 seconds but does the 1/4 mile in 11.1 seconds. Would that be worth trading your current car for?
Mexico is always 3 honks away…Don’t think too hard - you may pull a muscle…but on the road
I seriously wonder where all these people so concerned with 60-130 times drive their cars....
That's a good point. Are you comparing to a 2019 P100DL or a 2019 Performance Raven? It looks like the Raven had increased torque over the P100DL., based on Tesla's graph. But, it is damn close up to 37 mph. The extra torque might have been cancelled out by the 163 lbs of increased weight in the older car.I don’t think the older cars were quicker than the Plaids in any metric. They were plenty quick but I couldn’t find any indication that they were quicker than a Plaid.
View attachment 1025172View attachment 1025173
It's good to be able to identify the people who think their opinions are the only ones that matter. Thanks for your input.3AM roll racing is utterly useless except as a d*ck-waving contest.
The Model 3 Performance is quick where it needs to be - below 100 mph, where every single one of them spends 99% of its time.
Go speed racer, go, at 3AM in Mexico!It's good to be able to identify the people who think their opinions are the only ones that matter. Thanks for your input.
Certainly will. Be sure to keep your car in Chill mode when you're not joining us in Mexico, after all, nobody needs to accelerate quickly on American streets where these cars spend 90% of their time.Go speed racer, go, at 3AM in Mexico!
Certainly will. Be sure to keep your car in Chill mode when you're not joining us in Mexico, after all, nobody needs to accelerate quickly on American streets where these cars spend 90% of their time.
His opinion is spot on! Sausage fest is a better identifier…It's good to be able to identify the people who think their opinions are the only ones that matter. Thanks for your input.
I seriously wonder where all these people so concerned with 60-130 times drive their cars....
I find it fascinating when people who have been called out on their hypocrisy resort to accusing someone on the internet of doing the exact thing they're trying to do.If you'd like to dispute my assertion that your car and everyone else's in the US spends 99% of its time below 100 mph, you're gonna need documentation. Good luck with that.
Oh and I hope you win both the intarwebs and the d*ck-waving contest!
I find it fascinating when people who have been called out on their hypocrisy resort to accusing someone on the internet of doing the exact thing they're trying to do.
Nothing I posted here was intended to document some falsehood in your assertion. I intended to point out that your statement was patently ridiculous and added nothing of value to the discussion we were having about whether these cars FEEL fast above 100mph, without having to spell that out. Apparently I failed. Oh well.
If you'd like to dispute my assertion that your car and everyone else's in the US spends 99% of its time below 100 mph, you're gonna need documentation. Good luck with that.
Oh and I hope you win both the intarwebs and the d*ck-waving contest!
I don't believe I made any sort of blanket statements like you did, I started in this thread responding to the question of why people feel like these cars fall on their face at 45 mph. The fact that they do is just a fact, it has nothing to do with opinions.Because ONLY your opinion and those of others of your 3AM roll-racing brethren matters, right? That's why my statement is "patently ridiculous"??
You did indeed fail - at seeing the forest for the trees.