You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I'd wait for a second source.
GM built 50 cars, mostly Bolts, but some Leafs too, one-by-one by hand.
Then they built a batch of 130 Bolt AVs:
GM is ready to send 130 more self-driving Chevy Bolts onto US streets
So there are 180± on the road today.
Cruise employee here. throwaway for obvious reasons. It needs to be said that this is entirely marketing smoke and mirrors. The Cruise platform is significantly behind most other players in the market, and is having many many technical problems because of shortsighted leadership on Kyle's part, including high level people quitting (the head of planning and controls left last month because of Kyle, and more are threatening to quit) The reason I'm saying this is that this sort of public "everything is fine, we are the best" posturing leaks inwards. The opposite is very much true. Employees are very upset with Kyle because of things just like this. I make no exaggeration when I say Kyle is a mean-spirited, selfish person in private, and is very quick to publicly take credit for the work of others that he has emotionally and verbally abused. It's truly one of the most toxic environments I've ever been a part of.
From my discussions with a friend with intimate knowledge of the software side of Cruise, there is wild skepticism within the co that they even have the hardware needed to go L4 or L5. Big promises being made to GM by Kyle which is leading to smoke and mirrors to distract/buy time from more critical problems "under the hood."
I've been speaking to friends working at different companies across the self-driving industry, and almost all of them have their fair share of skepticism of L4 or L5, including those who are actively researching in the field.
The main reason for this is that current self-driving tech has plateaued with most companies going with the redundancy based approach (let's have 3 LIDARs instead of 1, and make that 4 IR sensors on each side instead of 2 etc.) simply because there is no revolutionary new tech that is a panacea to current L1 problems.
Sadly, explaining this to investors is next to impossible, so everyone keeps selling the same idea with a few more whistles as the next big thing while everyone is waiting for the big tech breakthrough that makes actual self-driving cars possible.
Until then, expect many more controlled environment (eg. airports or freeways where traffic is mostly smooth flowing, or roads with perfectly marked stop signs and pavement paint).
There is quite an interesting discussion about Cruise on YCombinator which seems to suggest it's all still vaporware: Cruise's 3rd generation self-driving car | Hacker News
Some of the comments:
Hacker News....a great source for reliable information I'm sure. Lol
"Until then, expect many more controlled environment (eg. airports or freeways where traffic is mostly smooth flowing, or roads with perfectly marked stop signs and pavement paint)."
The streets of San Francisco with bikers (and even raccoons) qualify as "controlled environments" with perfectly marked stop signs and pavement paint?
There is quite an interesting discussion about Cruise on YCombinator which seems to suggest it's all still vaporware: Cruise's 3rd generation self-driving car | Hacker News
Some of the comments:
We shall see. Google / Waymo are the most advanced and are at one disengagement every 5,000 miles or so, which is not good enough. I doubt anybody has self driving software. And by that I mean software that works 99.999% of the time (even that may not be enough). The problem is not normal day to day driving, it's the edge cases. I am fine with people disagreeing with me, but I bet the January 2018 DMV disengagements report will reveal a lot. My opinion is that the last 1% of FSD development will take 90% of the time.
The streets of San Francisco with bikers (and even raccoons) qualify as "controlled environments" with perfectly marked stop signs and pavement paint?
If we are using demo videos as a measuring stick then Tesla is also very advanced in FSD. That is not really the case.
Below is the reality in California as of last year. None of the results are very good.
Nobody really knows how Tesla is testing full autonomy at this point. It's quite possible that they have people testing FSD in standard looking Tesla cars with a driver behind the wheel and nobody would know the difference.
How would you know it if you saw it? All current Teslas have the cameras and sensors in place, so the only thing that would need to be added would be software. More than once I have seen Teslas with California manufacturer plates at Superchargers in North and South Carolina.Have you yet seen Tesla hide an advanced feature from the public that is in operation?
How would you know it if you saw it? All current Teslas have the cameras and sensors in place, so the only thing that would need to be added would be software. More than once I have seen Teslas with California manufacturer plates at Superchargers in North and South Carolina.