Are you sure about that? Sounds wrong since you dont get scored on AP.100 miles WHILE using autosteer. apparently a more recent (and undocumented) requirement.
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Are you sure about that? Sounds wrong since you dont get scored on AP.100 miles WHILE using autosteer. apparently a more recent (and undocumented) requirement.
We definitely do get scored on AP. Where did you hear otherwise?Are you sure about that? Sounds wrong since you dont get scored on AP.
Are you sure about that? Sounds wrong since you dont get scored on AP.
We definitely do get scored on AP. Where did you hear otherwise?
This says just the opposite.. you will not get scored, but they count the miles.
This says just the opposite.. you will not get scored, but they count the miles.
Yes. In another thread, I also voiced my skepticism, but someone linked me to a twitter thread where someone screenshotted an email from Tesla that specified the requirement.
View attachment 813686
My guess would be so that they can see that you can properly monitor AP/FSD without getting distracted.But now you need to drive 100 miles specifically with AP. I don't know why.
Not sure where you're confused by.
Safety score penalties don't count while on AP, but AP miles are logged. This has always been the case since Sept 25, 2021 when the beta qualifications started. And shortly after that, it was announced that you needed a minimum of 100 miles (no AP usage requirement). This was to stop people from driving 1 mile, getting a 100 score, and then parking their car.
But now you need to drive 100 miles specifically with AP. I don't know why. But it's there in that tweet in my post (#1163)
But now you need to drive 100 miles specifically with AP. I don't know why. But it's there in that tweet in my post (#1163)
That email says Early Access Program, which isn’t the same is the current Beta FSD program (as far as I know). I think that preceded the current FSD Beta. But maybe someone that knows for sure will chime in. Or someone that has receive FSD Beta that never uses AP during scoring.
Note that the email doesn’t say 100 miles of Safety Score on AP. It just say 100 miles of AP on the vehicle (lifetime is a perfectly plausible reading and makes sense to ensure the car works correctly).
I have no idea what they ACTUALLY mean of course, but certainly back in September this was most DEFINITELY NOT a requirement (I did not have any significant mileage on AP under Safety Scoring rules when I got into FSDb (b) on the first round - just a few miles at most). It does seem that 100 miles (or some minimum) was in general required at that time (just anecdotal from the first spreadsheets and who got in).
No one replied so I guess it's unique to me. However, it is back to working fine today. I just hope the climate control doesn't stop working on my trip through the Majave Desert!
Cool, well if anyone needs me, I’ll be out driving 100 miles to prove I can sit still with my eyes on the road for about 2 hours.To be crystal clear on how the Safety Score works:
- Miles driven on AP do count for total miles driven
- Any dings for following too closely, hard braking, aggressive turning, or forward collision warnings do NOT count while on AP and for three seconds following AP disengagement by the driver
- The downside of driving on AP is that the denominator used for calculating percentages of unsafe following, hard braking or aggressive turning does not count AP miles. Example: you drive 2 hours on AP, but in the 50 seconds you drive manually, if you follow too closely (while going at least 50mph) for 25 seconds, you’ll get dinged for unsafe following at 50% for that two-hour drive.
Did anyone with a recent delivered Y or X got it? like last month or so with the Ryzen mcu
No, it isnt. If the car isnt ready you increase the risk of a serious accident, with the possibility of the entire beta program being put on hold and/or greater scrutiny/intervention/interference by regulators (to say nothing of the hysterical screaming headlines generated in the press).Pressure from owners is a valid reason to expand.
No .. the recalibration process essentially allows the system to adjust for the slight variations in alignment between the various overlapping fields of view of the external cameras, which of course doesnt apply to the cabin camera.Do we know if recalibrating cameras includes the cabin camera!?