Knightshade
Well-Known Member
So after inflation it's now cheaper.
I mean... sure?
But also they're making 10x more of them, and the cost to make and deliver them is much lower too.
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So after inflation it's now cheaper.
Musk doing more Elons.
Musk labels CBC “69% Government-funded” as more news outlets quit Twitter
Musk previously labeled CBC as government-funded media on Sunday without any percentage displayed. Musk added the label after Canadian Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre asked Twitter to do so, claiming it was needed to "protect Canadians against disinformation and manipulation by state media." After Musk complied, Poilievre tweeted, "Now people know that it is Trudeau propaganda, not news."
The CBC disputed the government-funded label on Sunday, writing:
Twitter's own policy defines government-funded media as cases where the government "may have varying degrees of government involvement over editorial content," which is clearly not the case with CBC/Radio-Canada. CBC/Radio-Canada is publicly funded through a parliamentary appropriation that is voted upon by all Members of Parliament. Its editorial independence is protected in law in the Broadcasting Act... In addition, our journalism is independent and subject to our Journalistic Standards and Practices, as well as an independent complaints process.
Musk mocked NPR's description of its finances last week, falsely claiming that NPR deleted language from its website that said federal funding is essential to public radio. A reader-added context box attached to Musk's tweet corrects his error, pointing out that the statement about federal funding being essential to public radio is still on NPR's website.
What is this inflation you are talking about?So after inflation it's now cheaper.
I don't understand what the issue is. By their own admission they are less than 70% Govt funded. To be accurate they are 66% Govt funded.Musk doing more Elons.
Musk labels CBC “69% Government-funded” as more news outlets quit Twitter
Musk previously labeled CBC as government-funded media on Sunday without any percentage displayed. Musk added the label after Canadian Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre asked Twitter to do so, claiming it was needed to "protect Canadians against disinformation and manipulation by state media." After Musk complied, Poilievre tweeted, "Now people know that it is Trudeau propaganda, not news."
The CBC disputed the government-funded label on Sunday, writing:
Twitter's own policy defines government-funded media as cases where the government "may have varying degrees of government involvement over editorial content," which is clearly not the case with CBC/Radio-Canada. CBC/Radio-Canada is publicly funded through a parliamentary appropriation that is voted upon by all Members of Parliament. Its editorial independence is protected in law in the Broadcasting Act... In addition, our journalism is independent and subject to our Journalistic Standards and Practices, as well as an independent complaints process.
Musk mocked NPR's description of its finances last week, falsely claiming that NPR deleted language from its website that said federal funding is essential to public radio. A reader-added context box attached to Musk's tweet corrects his error, pointing out that the statement about federal funding being essential to public radio is still on NPR's website.
Seems to act like a 13 year old boy in social situations.This man is, allegedly, 51 years old.
But, was it really inflation or was it simply supply and demand?So after inflation it's now cheaper.
All very true, but before a period of inflation. So 49K is not what it was 3 years ago, and materials costs are likely up. It remains to be seen if volume growth has offset costs and price cuts to where profits aren't taking a hit.To be fair, they just cut the LR Model Y to $49,990.
Know what the price was roughly 3 years ago?
$49,990.
When profits were pretty solid.
For the most part these cuts are putting prices back to where they were pre-covid.... but with the benefits of much lower cost to build them due to economy of scale and localization of production.
Plus of course as you keep ramping production 30-50% annually you HAVE to lower prices to keep increasing TAM to absorb that production.
Not that I don't think Elon is pissing many off with his comments-- but that's not showing up in Teslas sales so far.
Also turning off existing base of customers that many were active sales people for Tesla. Honestly I dont want to be in a conversation pushing Tesla and people get angry because of Elon.But, was it really inflation or was it simply supply and demand?
There has been a correction for a LOT of vehicles, and the ones that haven't corrected are supply limited.
When it comes to Tesla specifically I think they're suffering from dated designs and the lack of innovation. I'm not even aware of anything new in the pipeline that is attractive to the mainstream car buyer.
There also suffering from the fact that their best sales person not only isn't showing up for work, but he turns off so many customers.
We keep asking the question whether Elon is turning off people from a Tesla, but maybe we should be asking if there is any reason to keep him?
Precisely…maybe read the whole article not just the headline.I don't understand what the issue is. By their own admission they are less than 70% Govt funded. To be accurate they are 66% Govt funded.
If your heart burn is due to the 3% difference between 69 and 66%, I agree you have a point.
Not just cost of materials, but costs of employees as well. Unless Tesla and suppliers didnt give out pay increases then the human capital costs have increased. Of course that gets offset by productivity gains, but those gains have been happening overtime any ways.All very true, but before a period of inflation. So 49K is not what it was 3 years ago, and materials costs are likely up. It remains to be seen if volume growth has offset costs and price cuts to where profits aren't taking a hit.
It will ultimately remain a question, because we can't know exactly what Elon has done to potential volume with his antics.
Yup. I’ve shut up telling anyone about our cars. Answer now “they are just cars”.Also turning off existing base of customers that many were active sales people for Tesla. Honestly I dont want to be in a conversation pushing Tesla and people get angry because of Elon.
All very true, but before a period of inflation. So 49K is not what it was 3 years ago, and materials costs are likely up. It remains to be seen if volume growth has offset costs and price cuts to where profits aren't taking a hit.
It will ultimately remain a question, because we can't know exactly what Elon has done to potential volume with his antics.
Not just cost of materials, but costs of employees as well. Unless Tesla and suppliers didnt give out pay increases then the human capital costs have increased. Of course that gets offset by productivity gains, but those gains have been happening overtime any ways.
I don't think anyone can draw conclusions one way or another from sales numbers. There are too many confounds and trying to draw a conclusion or calculate effect size of the Twitter purchase on Tesla sales is a fool's errand.
It might be that the "truth" is out there in our DNA, millions of years of rivalry and symbiosis between species. It's brutal. The human brain simply tries to cloak it in a nice story. If an AI would discover the "truth", it would simply "cut to the chase" in all things like a psychopath numbers cruncher.
Given that humans wildly disagree on many aspects of "morality" (including Elon careening back and forth between various absolutist stances he doesn't appear to actually believe in), I don't think there is any DNA to it.
At best, we might find a societal-level consensus.... which is kinda what our various legal systems do.
I regret that one of the things Elon proclaimed but later abandoned was the blue-ribbon panel to lead Twitters moderation policy decisions. An open, transparent version of that is what's needed, not a mindless AI bot channeling the "wisdom" of stuff it heard on wikipedia
DNA is just the search algorithm.
I'm not even aware of anything new in the pipeline that is attractive to the mainstream car buyer.