Publish in peer review or snide from the safety of forum anonymity.
You?
Fix or pretend.
Speak or do.
Publish or invent.
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Publish in peer review or snide from the safety of forum anonymity.
You?
Peer reviewed journal database? No probs.There are networked grids to increase humanities understanding of the universe around them. Join one.
Been there, done that. Cesspool of anti-intellectual narcissism, where members delude themselves that wealth = intellectOr just join the marketing department of whatever megacorp pulls your chain the hardest.
Parrot from echo chamber or submit ideas for critique by peersFix or pretend.
Speak or do.
Publish or invent.
Wait a minute. Were you under the misapprehension that Bitcoin was created by left wing ideology?Slightly off topic - Why isn't the Green Community infuriated by Cryptocurrency?
A massive amount of CO2 is produced every hour in heavily populated regions for no reason whatsoever. Well, except greed. No upside. Completely wasted energy, much of it from coal (China).
About 66 TWh a year now.
Wait a minute. Were you under the misapprehension that Bitcoin was created by left wing ideology?
The Strange Connection Between Bitcoin and the Alt-Right
SPLC is like some 'ecology' groups. In it for the bucks, they fund by extortion. "If you don't donate, we will list you as a climate change denier." It's a great way to make untaxable quick cash for little effort. Sort of like robbing liquor stores if you are FBI.
Nice try.The list for folks wrongly listed by the now purely-political-marketing firm Southern Poverty (cough) Law (gag) Center as hate groups is astounding. Any American who is not a donor to the SPLC is at threat of being labelled a Hate Group, and blacklisted from social networks such a FB/Twit/IG, etc, by SPLC's marketing/donation department. The fact the SPLC does know they are often wrong, still does not evoke an apology. Because of course, they make more money the more people they accuse. SPLC are indeed a Hate Group who funds their operations by extortion, and so far the RICO act can't touch them.
SPLC 12/2017 - "Bitcoin purchases can be traced by a determined researcher. And, the Southern Poverty Law Center will be releasing a list of 200 accounts tied to white nationalists and racists in the coming week."
That list is comprised of 36 individuals and entities that may or may not be political organizations, SPLC is not a court, nor exactly honest. Out of perhaps 5,000,000 accounts, claiming 200 are Nasi's/Etc, they found 36 who might just be innocent bystanders, since guilt in not necessary to make their list.
One of many examples, by a liberal press outlet - How Did Maajid Nawaz End Up on a List of 'Anti-Muslim Extremists'? - The Atlantic
Best guess? Companies who accept bitcoin will be approached by SPLC for a 'donation', which is actually extortion. It has proven so successful, that it is expanding. Expect the ACLU to 'enhance' their donations soon.
SPLC is like some 'ecology' groups. In it for the bucks, they fund by extortion. "If you don't donate, we will list you as a climate change denier." It's a great way to make untaxable quick cash for little effort. Sort of like robbing liquor stores if you are FBI.
If you are an informed climate change skeptic like myself it is all but impossible to have a civilized debate online about it so I don't even try any more. As soon as you question the AGW orthodoxy you are immediately insulted as a 'denier', then called stupid, and then labelled an oil company shill. If you persist in the debate you will eventually be likened to Hitler. No thanks, not worth it.
BTW - Mauna Loa is interesting. We melted our shoes and watched lava flow into the Pacific. It smells strongly of sulfur and is due for another major eruption soon (geologically). It's the tallest mountain on earth IIRC if you measure it from it's base to it's peak? (most of it is underwater).
A very strange place to measure average levels of anything. Europe has been industrialized far longer than the US, let's check there:
File:Greenhouse gas emissions (including international aviation, indirect CO2 and excluding LULUCF) trend, EU-28, 1990 - 2015 (Index 1990=100)-Fig1.png - Statistics Explained
In my experience, anthropogenic global warming (AGW) science denial is, by & large, accompanied by logically fallacious reasoning & a poor understanding of the peer reviewed scientific method/process. It’s also from a perceived need to defend one’s ‘team’ born out of cognitive dissonance, but we’re not allowed to discuss that on here (or most forums, in my experience over years, for that matter), even though it goes a fair way to explaining the rationale of said position.If you are an informed climate change skeptic like myself it is all but impossible to have a civilized debate online about it so I don't even try any more. As soon as you question the AGW orthodoxy you are immediately insulted as a 'denier', then called stupid, and then labelled an oil company shill. If you persist in the debate you will eventually be likened to Hitler. No thanks, not worth it.
...
By the way, did you know the term ‘climate change’ was born because focus group studies found the term ‘global warming’ too confronting?
...
I am a climate change skeptic but I am open to evidence on either side.
That argument has a tincture of merit, but what follows is incredible: links to debunked garbage, newspaper articles, and personal blogs as something to rationally anchor the skepticism.This is then refuted as being a logical fallacy itself of argumentum ad verecundiam (appeal to authority), because scientific consensus is relied upon rather than the science itself.
??? Did you post that from 1970? Because if not you're a denier not a skeptic...
Okay we just had a Godwin's rule failure in this thread. Please be polite and avoid personal attacks.
The good news is that most of the American public has figured out that that the AGW scare is phony and understand that all the name calling and denier insults are what they do to people when they can't win arguments on the basis of science and have to resort to ad hominem attacks in an a futile attempt to prove their point. That is glaringly obvious in a few of the posts here. It always happens in global warming threads.
BTW it is funny that you mention 1970 since that is about the time that after years of cooling the scientists of the day were trying to convince that we were about to enter another ice age. Now they tell us that we are going to burn up.
I am sure you have NO idea just how foolish you are, or you just posted garbage.I am sure you have NO idea just how foolish you are, or you just posted a very good troll.