Musk originally estimated it would go out sometime in December but wouldn't reach parity with AP1 until early in 2017, so rough assumption being end of Q1 2017 for parity. Doesn't seem like that bad of a estimate so far.
-
Want to remove ads? Register an account and login to see fewer ads, and become a Supporting Member to remove almost all ads.
- Status
erthquake
Active Member
Kenriko
Former Vendor
racer26
Active Member
Its a step in the right direction, but still falls short - if an automaker offers a compelling EV, it will completely cannibalize their non-EV offerings. This is why none of the incumbents have offered a compelling EV, and all we get are compliance cars and PHEVs.
mmd
Active Member
Will they never learn? Hybrids are half-measures and probably adds little if any value over an ICE. Just gives drivers the "feeling" they are doing something good at an inflated cost. So stupid.
After the Deutsche Bank deal I don't see a reason why Tesla should somehow try to push the SP.
Personally I agree, I think they will release the numbers at 4:00 EST. But if Tesla wants to spread out the good news, they do have the option of doing so.
Kenriko
Former Vendor
If you burn the shorts they are less likely to short in the stock in the future. Though who am I kidding? The shorts seem to be operating in tin foil hat mode.
So a week off from his 3 week estimation on rollout and he did a good job of giving regular updates on twitter. This seems reasonable enough for estimating a major software update. If parity isn't reached by end of Q1, that would be a more significant miss imo.
Last edited:
Willful ignorance exists across income brakets. Tesla was never an Obama car or company, just a convenient political target that people are willing to accept until told how otherwise to believe
Alternatively, Tesla could operate like an OEM or Mobileye and you "could, possibly, although we're not sure, haven't developed or implemented anything, but our tea-leaves (and marketing department) tell us that we'll have market leading autonomous technology by 2019....or 2020.....or 2025....".
I will take Tesla's messy reality of today vs. all the empty promises and vapor ware everyone else seems to peddle.
Last edited:
"shown" is the keyword. Here are some later ones that do not show up on ev-cpo.
Model S P100D 5YJSA1E41GF177479 | Tesla
Model S P100D 5YJSA1E41GF177482 | Tesla
Model S P100D 5YJSA1E45GF177484 | Tesla
Model S P100D 5YJSA1E47GF177485 | Tesla
Model S P100D 5YJSA1E42GF177488 | Tesla
Model S P100D 5YJSA1E44GF177489 | Tesla
Regarding growing inventory - they have thousands of inventory "overall" if you compute the total Produced minus total Sold over the course of time. I don't know for sure if a "do over" car built that does not pass QA is considered a Production +1 or it is written off immediately. If an employee can drive it a little bit for a quarter - it can be counted as production and then written down a later time.
Five 168xxx not on ev-cpo.
Pre-Owned Model S | Tesla
Pre-Owned Model S | Tesla
Model S P100D 5YJSA1E45GF168428 | Tesla
Model S P100D 5YJSA1E43GF168430 | Tesla
Model S P90D 5YJSA1E45GF168476 | Tesla
The undervalued thing about the SolarCity merger is that Tesal is branding itself as THE company who really wants to fight climate change, an issue that many people concerns and gives BTW. Tesla a ridicules amount of free coverage (Tesla pulls the Trump LOL). The whole solar thing brings Tesla a lot of love form the greentards* which have a lot of money.
*quote Mark Spiegel
*quote Mark Spiegel
Haha, thanks for the shout out. I think those November 200 calls would have done pretty well, though Decembers would have been better
Anyone buy any around that time and make good profit?
Yep, let's stop giving him free advertising.
3Victoria
Active Member
Are those actually ev-cpos, or are they demo or display cars, not for sale (yet)?
- Status
Similar threads
- Sticky
