Jonathan Hewitt
Active Member
I didn't click through to the link. How many zeros are going to be added to the stock price?
-
Want to remove ads? Register an account and login to see fewer ads, and become a Supporting Member to remove almost all ads.
- Status
DragonWatch
Small FootPrint
As a long term investor, many of you may have missed all the other stock poss events. Where Tesla had not already fixed an issue, Tesla responded promptly with high professional standards. No other company can remotely compare. Other car companies quickly blame the driver, the tires or god for their design flaws ~ the American way. Not Tesla. Tesla proactively rectifies the issue at or above industry standards; usually above the standard!
Well, his TSLA (short) position is heading to a value much lower than zero.
Agreed about cash sparing moves. Other evidence (at least in my area of the country). Opening new Service Centers that have been 'in the works' for over a year are still delayed: Cherry Hill, NJ; Baltimore, MD and Pittsburgh, PA. to name a few.
Thanks Fred L.: Shell to install EV chargers (starting in Britain/Netherlands)
Shell says it will start installing electric vehicle chargers at its gas stations this year
Shell says it will start installing electric vehicle chargers at its gas stations this year
Last edited:
TSLA up around $2 in pre-market. The voices in Smiegel's head may be off a tad on that.
I think Gorsuch will have no effect on TSLA. Everyone says he's very similar to Scalia philosophically, but less... well... corrupt, I guess? Scalia had a very nasty tendency to decide identical cases differently depending on who the plaintiffs were and his preconceived biases about them, which made him an inherently bad judge who brought discredit on the entire judicial system. Gorsuch seems to have a record of being more *impartial*, so that's good.
Gorsuch's mother was a monster who tried to destroy the EPA and ended up resigning after being caught misusing Superfund money, though.
Wow I stopped at page 1. It literally goes on for like 5+ pages. Just a bunch of non sense similar to his amateur PowerPoint presentation he gave
The Attorney General has a sworn duty to uphold the law, and a specific duty to determine on her own initiative whether a supposed executive order is in fact legal.
If you look at the original constitutional structure, the heads of the executive departments have individual and personal responsibility for their decisions. The *convention* that they serve at the pleasure of the President is actually only a convention, not the constitution.
As some wag pointed out, it's the "Department of Justice", not the "Department of Following Orders"
Structure is fine as proved by real world results. With that said, it's rather surprising that IIHS has rated LED headlight Poor. Same article also mentions that P100D was rated Acceptable for roof integrity due to increased weight of the battery (I'm not clear if they tested the roof - sounds like they just plugged new weight numbers into their formula).
Two electric cars miss IIHS awards
Last edited:
also, breaking news, back in the 1950's, a Russian Lada and a Ford had a race, as reported in Pravda (truth) The Lada came in second, and the Ford came in next to last (ie first)
My radar is going off with the recent 8-K. This seems like a deliberate attempt to drive home the point that Tesla is deserving of a higher market cap because it does more than just cars. It also seems like a direct response to the multiple analyst reports giving SCTY and TE zeroes - these aren't diversions for the company, they are (or will be) equal players.
I expect this to be a theme in the upcoming ER as guidance is set. I'm seeing Andrea James' influence all over this one.
I expect this to be a theme in the upcoming ER as guidance is set. I'm seeing Andrea James' influence all over this one.
Gerasimental
Member
Utterly off-topic but need to name drop here. Harold Laski is my great-great-uncle! A very interesting man, even if he is responsible for this train-wreck of a sentence, as picked up by Orwell in his essay 'Politics And the English Language':
I think more likely that this was just their first chance since the merger. It has only been a month. Think youre being overly optimistic. TE is going to be a big part of Tesla, but I dont think it will today. SCTY was worth 1/10th what tesla was when it took over. If it contributes much this Q Ill be quite surprised. I mean, it may push Tesla earning positive but much more than that I think is a long long shot.
RobStark
Well-Known Member
It is a data point. Have a better one? Post it.
My guess is as time goes on Tesla owner base spreads beyond hardcore liberal green base on the West Coast.
I'm not sure how you concluded that I thought TE would be a big earnings component for the Q4 report from my post.
My point is that I think the theme of the upcoming ER is "we are more than just a car company" and this name change is symbolic. To me, this means guidance will include TE and SCTY as material elements for 2017 and therefore provide a rationale as to why Tesla is deserving of a market cap higher than traditional automakers.
RobStark
Well-Known Member
a) This applies equally to D Presidents and R Presidents?
b) It is the Department of Justice not the Department of Do Whatever I Want to Do.
Thumper
Active Member
Perhaps the crash test dummy was not perfectly restrained because the anchor point for the top of the belt is not adjustable on the S like is is on the X. My wife has complained about this since our S was new 4 years ago. It seems like it would be easy to use the adjustable mechanism from the X bs just put it in all the Ss. In any case, my wife and I will not upgrade to a new S unless the anchorage is adjustable.
- Status
Similar threads
- Sticky
