http://www.examiner.com/x-14333-Gre...st-charging-for-electric-vehicles-PlugIn-2010
What is more important - a single port or a quick decision ? With millions being spent right now by the government to install fast chargers in many areas, it seems to me a quick decision to adopt Japanese standard is the right thing. I'm also naturally suspicious of GM holding the position of chairman - I think there is a conflict of interest here.
Imagine ones surprise when the panel session ended with a loud bit of name-calling between automakers. Clearly we have a controversy brewing in the standards committees and the controversy is part of the delay in developing fast charging capability in electric vehicles.
....
The panel contained members of the SAE committee's who are defining the standards. Each described the desired result as a single charging port, giving two reasons. First, car designers want to minimize the number of "holes" in the car body. The reason was unstated but aerodynamics and strength are two obvious reasons. For a plug-in hybrid like the GM Volt there is one hole for the gasoline filler hose, another hole for the AC Level 2 charge port, and would there be a third hole for a DC Fast charge port? In Nissan's case they accommodated this by having one large hole that accommodates both the J1772 and CHAdeMO charge ports. Being an electric car it doesn't need a hole for the gasoline filler hose it would be unable to use.
What is more important - a single port or a quick decision ? With millions being spent right now by the government to install fast chargers in many areas, it seems to me a quick decision to adopt Japanese standard is the right thing. I'm also naturally suspicious of GM holding the position of chairman - I think there is a conflict of interest here.