I'm not talking about shutting down the supercharger network, that was never on the table despite the initial hysteria suggesting that (neither was shutting down Tesla), so your analogy doesn't apply. Rather it's slowing down the pace of expansion to a rate where it can at least break even.
Tesla as a whole is doing similar, they are doing layoffs to bring costs down closer to match with actual revenue. This is not the first time they did that either, here's a history:
Looks like Tesla is rehiring people to keep new installations going, and presumably their liaison for NACS adoption have either been rehired or has a replacement. As long as NACS adoption continues,
then EV charging demand can be offloaded to third party networks and also all the stations currently getting billions of NEVI funding, and Teslas can use them (given they will have NACS). Superchargers don't have to be the only option. That's why I've been saying upthread, that keeping communication with automakers on NACS adoption was far more critical than new installations.