Freder Reeve
Member
first time seeing ravens show up in my local inventory, 2x S and 14 mX. The "Pay-Per-Use Supercharging" stands out.
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
To everyone complaining that they haven't made money since 2015 holding Tesla, you can sleep a little better at night knowing that this guy haven't since Tesla went IPO.
https://opendata.rdw.nl/Voertuigen/Open-Data-RDW-Gekentekende_voertuigen/m9d7-ebf2what was the link for Netherlands gov agency where you can see homologated cars? it was here on the forum before M3-s arrived to Europe.
Oddly, I fully agree with both of you.
I'd just add that the "corruption" on the editor end might be simple personal bias. Remember, if they don't have an EV, they probably don't think an EV makes sense. Why that is can vary greatly.
The issue of horrible media coverage is something we've been trying to deal with for years. I think it was actually the original Broder story that really got me covering Tesla. (Guess we can thank Broder for that.) I'm not thrilled with the approaches we've taken and I'd rather not be too combative, but we also have to call *sugar* out (neroden style).
I think Max does a great job of polite but sharp. But any further suggestions for what we can do at CleanTechnica are welcome from everyone who has an opinion.
Yeah. That's updated March 28, 2018Innocent mistake or manipulation and FUD? Look at the circled link in the pic below. This is today’s news feed in the iOS built in stock app. Click on that link and it takes you to an article dated March 28. It never ends!
View attachment 423106
This is today’s news feed in the iOS built in stock app. Click on that link and it takes you to an article dated March 28.
i think it was excellent effort to go back and track the writer down and try to get to the bottom of it and explore some common ground. that should not be overlooked, and thank you!
i agree there’s many cases where one single person is not to blame. it’s the system, the organization, the structure of some media outlets, and the business model. so somewhere in the middle is where i sit. i admire a real journalist. i’ll admit i was tricked into believing there was a lot less of those until i read your comments and realized it’s the system they’re stuck in that has become increasingly sucky due to the way power and $ control the organizations. but where is a pissed off, underutilized, talented journalist going to go if stuck in that situation? it’s either provide for yourself or you family until you can find something better with more journalistic freedom, or starve? not much choice there. we don’t all have the luxury of being able to exercise every righteous inclination at will.. i found a lot of good points made from the OP and the responses.
—————-
that said, sentiment in tesla coverage varies by piece topic and organizational intent of providing that content in the first place.
there’s pro-green (mostly pro-tesla) outlets...
these are more than offset by the “generally benevolent” media actors, who couldn’t care less. maybe they’re mentioning tesla to get a quick hit of attention or because a particular story became viral. but it’s not really great or horrible, most non-informative, and clearly they’re just capitalizing on tesla being a hotly debated topic. no value added.
but the last type of tesla’s news actors are more deliberate, premeditated, and harmful.
the smear and the hit pieces to manipulate the outcome of tesla or tsla.
there’s a clear difference. whether it be single person, whole organizations, system failure., whatever you want to point the finger at per piece of content
it’s clear, apparent, and getting stronger at each critical stage of tesla growth. also undeniable.
it may not be the majority of total news coverage but it’s sure the loudest, and that compounds the problem. ignoring it also strengthens its impact.
Whether it has an impact is also likely affected by where they were assigning the SR+ from the Grand Mark. From where we're looking, not many assigned to locations all too far from Zeebrugge (except for Norway) -- they really would prefer these delivered than stuck on trucks or Delivery Centers at the end of the quarter.At least it's just Suisse, can't be huge numbers. SR+ delivered in NO, so EFTA ok and I think Elizabeth S's car is an SR+ and she took delivery, so EU is OK.
Again, the question I think @tinm and others are struggling with (myself included) is how to break through and get more people to understand the full story well.
March 2018, you mean?
Explain to people (yourself included) what is happening and why.
A whole bunch of news pieces from 2018 published in Investopedia got "updated" today, so they got picked up by the algorithms and pushed into the newsfeed... It's a mixture of both positive and negative stories, as well as unrelated crap (SpaceX to fly the first private customer around the Moon in the BFR)... if it's a targeted campaign, it's pretty dumb.Does anyone know why Yahoo Finance is surfacing click-bait BS from March and publishing them as new stories?
Tesla 'On The Verge' of Bankruptcy: Vilas Capital
From our research, it's the bulk of coverage at the ~24 biggest media outlets frequently covering Tesla: Pravduh About Tesla Archives | CleanTechnica
I think there are a few reasons. Some may have overall corruption at play (would not be surprised if this is the case at BI or CNBC). Others may simply be in a sub-culture that has absorbed anti-Tesla talking points and think they are real, so repeat them often. Others may simply be chasing clicks or may be resentful for one reason or another. Almost across the board, I assume they don't "get it."
Again, the question I think @tinm and others are struggling with (myself included) is how to break through and get more people to understand the full story well.