Welcome to Tesla Motors Club
Discuss Tesla's Model S, Model 3, Model X, Model Y, Cybertruck, Roadster and More.
Register

Tesla, TSLA & the Investment World: the Perpetual Investors' Roundtable

This site may earn commission on affiliate links.
Apparently, after Twitter Overhang™️ suppressed the TSLA SP, now it is time for Banter Overhang™️...🤡

This washed-up Wall Streeter will blame anything but himself for his fund's non-performance.

Elon's extracurricular activities not only caused him to sell 10s of billions $ of stock, but also drew in a lot of bad publicity. Tesla had no reason to crash to the low 100s otherwise.

And as for now, yes I agree institutional investors are concerned about the well being of Musk's health and are not happy with the risk he is willing to take as a publicity stunt for X so overhang is real. You guys realize all of these institutional investors are always on the phone with each other and Gary is the point man for trying to make sense of it all. He is the one being questioned by other institutional investors about every Musk's extracurricular activity that is unrelated to Tesla but adds risk to Tesla.
 
investors are concerned about the well being of Musk's health
That is so dumb! He has been working out and lifting weights every day. (he claims) He is probably in better health now than he has been for a while. The spinal thing is not connected with this fitness, but was caused by what you could call getting into a stupid fight situation. BTW put me in the group that hopes he will never fight Zuck
 
Last edited:
Looks like ASP bottom may not yet have been reached. Margin bottom...harder to say, should be some more cost savings in Q3. China economy not doing well may make profitability very low local Tesla China sales.

This, combined with repeated delays in FSD progress means institutions will not be assigning a high earnings growth rate on Tesla for the forseeable future. I would say amazing Tesla Energy progress could boost the stock, but it sounds like they won't get the 2nd line up and running until year end, so we won't recognize another 20 gWh of revenue until mid 2024.

It's really looking like mid 2024 might be when Tesla may hit $400 again.
 
That is 9 trucks, why photoshop the image to look like 27?
nine trucks email.png
 
Exciting times.
How does it work in regards to delivering to customers?
Do we need to wait for EPA certification first?
Or could Tesla hold a delivery event before they receive official certification?
Another question on this-
Do we know if it’s been submitted for EPA cert already and how long it normally takes? (I know Elon said on the earnings that since this is radically new design concepts it will take longer… or something along this lines)
EPA process:
Certification and Fuel Economy for Light-Duty Passenger Cars and Trucks | US EPA

For heavy duty (different category) , they say they try for a 30 day or less turn around for issuing the certificate after submittal and request. Tesla needs the cert to sell the cars.
 
It's really looking like mid 2024 might be when Tesla may hit $400 again.
IMO mid 2024 seems like a time when the progress Tesla is making should be more apparent.

The trend towards clean energy and transport may be more widely accepted.

Some of the choppy water in the global economy and global politics might have settled down, though we can't bank on that.

Interest rates may have peaked, and may be trending back down.

End of 2023 might not be enough time for all of these ducks to line up.
 
You guys realize all of these institutional investors are always on the phone with each other and Gary is the point man for trying to make sense of it all. He is the one being questioned by other institutional investors about every Musk's extracurricular activity that is unrelated to Tesla but adds risk to Tesla.

You guys realise that Gary has a X subscription @ $10 a pop to supplement his income and struggles to put together $10 million between his two ETFs. Hardly a sign of being a point man for Wall St. 😂

In any case, if Tesla was run in the way that Wall St wanted it to be run, it would have still remained a niche car maker forced to advertise itself on TV as an AI company ( or whatever is trendy) with a PR department(&budget) that’s bigger than its R&D department.
 
Last edited:
CNBC has an important story called:
"Cyber concerns: CNBC executive's old Tesla ends up in Ukraine, new owner able to access accounts"

The story goes like this: a CNBC executive's totaled Tesla was shipped by the scrap yard to Ukraine and Spotify was still logged in, which obviously raises concerns about the Cybertruck launch.
More of the story: CNBC executive is a Swifty per multiple Spotify playlists...
 
Nice post Unk. I know we've discussed this before, but do you feel there's any validity to the rumor that the Gen3 cars that will be built in Mexico are destined for Brazil primarily? I think for the deployment to be successful, not only would they need to be priced below $30k USD (or lower) but Tesla would need to build out the Supercharger network and service centers at a pace equal to or faster than the arrival of the cars. Does the potential audience have the capability to charge using just the base voltage available at home (which would help a lot while the supporting infrastructure is being put together)?

Would be interested on your and @GhostSkater 's opinions on the matter. Brazil is a huge to date untapped market and the interest seems to be there...
The trade agreement between Mexico and Brazil differ from those Mercosur countries that are not vehicle exports and producers. There are defined limits on mexico exports of vehicles to Brazil. Periodic renegotiations alter the specifics but back in 2012 they actually agreed on a monetary value limit for Mexican vehicle exports to Brazil. In 2023 it was very interesting:

That probably resulted from the improving bilateral trade trade between them in recent years,
May 2023, Brazil exported $924M and imported $511M from Mexico.

The May 2023 trade balance was very positive for Brazil:
"In May 2023, the increase in Brazil's year-by-year exports to Mexico was explained primarily by an increase in product exports in Semi-Finished Iron($34.1M or 7.83M%), Cars ($14.2M or 53.4%), and Forging Machines ($10.2M or 425%). In May 2023, the increase in Brazil's year-by-year imports from Mexico was explained primarily by an increase in product imports in Computers($9.96M or 98%), Scrap Aluminium ($5.65M or 110%), and Oxygen Heterocyclic Compounds ($3.5M or 130k%)."
source: Brazil (BRA) and Mexico (MEX) Trade | OEC

The net of all that is that while trade between the two two is rising and is very productive for both there is potential for very rapid disruption if there were a sudden increase in complete auto exports from either one to the other. Still the auto trade remains strongly positive for Brazil:

That all seems quite optimistic for Tesla to export from Mexico to Brazil. But...it is not quite so simple as that..
Large truck and bus manufacturers, notably Volkswagen, Mercedes-Benz and Marco polo have been adept at managing their Brazil-Mexico trade as well as in the rest of Mercosur and pretty much globally. They all are deeply invested in local content rules and optimization. Those practices are evident in the Brazil-Mexico large vehicle tariff agreement mentioned above. Relevant also is BYD growing impact in the BEV bus market.

So, specifically for Tesla what does all this mean? Factually the choices are clear and obvious.
Imported BEV's are still entitled to exemption from tariffs:
but were Tesla to suddenly, at long last, enter the Brazilian market they could do so with Chinese, German, US or Mexican production without duty. However, were Tesla to do that the howls of anguish from Stellantis, Mercedes-Benz, VAG and CAOA (producer/distributor/dealer of Hyundai and Chery and very influential Brazilian company which is one of few manufacturers which follow the Tesla direct sakes model, although they do not build under their own name). Since Volkswagen and Fiat are the two dominant brands in Brazil those howls will be heard. GM will howl loudly too, and their position in Brazil is a narrow third behind VW and Fiat, with dominant market for the Brazil taxi market as well as designing some GM. products for global production. Were Tesla to enter Brazil those manufacturers, already well positioned, will have their anguish very visibly and persuasively heard. After all, all but Caoa are already feeling the Chinese threat, which they really cannot fight.

Tesla, therefore, will not succeed without some careful and judicious planning. They will need to make investments in Brazil-sourced components, including mining and refining if they want to have Minas Gerais support (BTW, Fiat did that with stellar success), a crucial political factor.

Without question, if Tesla wish to import finished cars to Brazil from Mexico, they must take great care to avoid upsetting the trade balance between those countries. Volkswagen, presently importing some models from Mexico themselves, and Mercedes-Benz, which also has done that, have also exported vehicles from Brazil. Their huge investments in Brazilian manufacturing enhance their privileged positions. Stellantis is perhaps even stronger than the other two since Brazil is the largest Fiat market in the world, more than Italy, with some models designed in Brazil too.

Before this post becomes too long, the master point is that Brazil is an integrated manufacturers of vehicles with a huge supplier base. Success there is contingent on supporting that model. Mexico, by contrast is essentially an assembler (Maquiladora, essentially a duty-free zone that permits import of parts, assembly, reexport, all duty free). The same process does exist in Brazil (Manaus Free trade Zone) Google 'Manaus' to know why that marvelous place is impossible for auto manufacturing.

Perhaps that is too much information. However, since Brazil is by far the largest auto market Tesla does not serve and building in Brazil conveniently serves most of South America it seems quite relevant to Tesla interest now.

Of course I admit my bias, but that is, I think, hardly necessary. My own bias is perhaps stronger because of direct involvement in planning for two of the leaders in the Brazilian market. It's long past due for Tesla to enter Brazil.
 
Last edited: