I am trying the 18"Care to post that data?
Once you do, post the wet braking distances for what you define as a good, "efficient" tire, and I'll find a tire that absolutely crushes that wet braking distance, and then we can discuss why it's OK to run the efficient tire when there is a much better tire out there for emergency stops. It's OK to give up max wet braking for some fuzzy "efficiency" number that saves you money, but not for other reasons that save you money?
The reality is that anyone looking for a tire with "efficiency" as the primary target has already agreed that maximal safety is not their goal (which is fine, just pointing out the hypocrisy of using this as a metric of an acceptable tire)
Hankook Ventus S1 evo2s
from the same ratings that was used above2020 Auto Bild UHP 19 inch Tyre Test - Tyre reviews and ratings
Ultra high performance tyre tests always make us happy, and Auto Bild do some of the best. For 2020, AutoBild have tested nine sports tyres in the staggered 245/35 R19 and 265/35 R19 sizes using a ...
www.tyrereviews.com
Positive - Excellent tyre with a balanced performance in all tests, stable in the dry and wet, low noise, low fuel use, good price to performance ratio.
Negative - Slightly slow steering response.
Overall - Recommended.
have to get them mounted up and see what kind of efficiency hoping it is better than the 21" stock Michelins on ubers
$677 total and I will mount balance.