Jigglypuff
Member
Among Israeli citizens, I believe that's a small minority. Most are pretty content from what I've seen. Police don't go around asking Arab Israelis for their papers. Lots of segregation in that society at night. Not as much during the day. It's an interesting country for sure.Then they can play the victim card. Very good at it
I don't think I've ever met an American anywhere on the political spectrum who has identified themselves with state over country, at least not out loud. I don't know any true extremists though. I do know people who don't feel a lot of patriotism, but then they also don't feel much of a connection to their state or locality either. They're more "I'm a human" or "I'm trans" type of people."Few Americans identify with their states more than with the nation"
Militarily or foreign policy wise but when it comes to local day-to-day life, the majority of Americans will always focus on the local/state level first.
btw: sorry, facts are facts, regardless of the source delivery. I'd bet that your dismissal of that periodical aligns with your strong political views versus basis in fact (I derive mine from subscribing/reading and understanding both sides of the spectrum and ignore the rhetoric of the fringes of both ). That brief article delineates facts regardless of your dismissal.
The brief article from the Heritage Foundation cherry picks some facts and then spins them into a far larger message than the facts prove. It's classic political misdirection. The Time article, in contrast, brings a lot more information in and then draws clear conclusions without spinning. But you be you.