You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I’m not sure we should really take anything he says or tweets seriously anymore.
The Model Y is likely to end the year (and currently appears to already be) the best selling car in the world.
Seems attractive enough to mainstream buyers to me.
But, that isn't anything new.
If a company fails to innovate and fails to bring out new models then their sales begin to drop.
It is true that its a bit different with EV's which tend to be supply limited, and not demand limited. But, I am concerned that Tesla doesn't really have anything new to offer mainstream buyers.
This won't impact them in the short term, but could in 3-4 years.
The issue is that the label "gov't funded" has negative implications. Specifically, that the government controls their content, which is not the case. It's a label that never existed in Twitter until Musk incorrectly labeled NPR as "state affiliated media". That was false, but to save face he changed it to "government-funded media." Again, a new label which was only created so Musk can claim he never backtracked. He just keeps digging a deeper hole by doubling down.I don't understand what the issue is. By their own admission they are less than 70% Govt funded. To be accurate they are 66% Govt funded.
If your heart burn is due to the 3% difference between 69 and 66%, I agree you have a point.
If true, strange how Musk had no problem with it until Microsoft stopped being a Twitter advertiser. But it's probably an Elon.
Is CBC less than 70% Govt funded or not ?The issue is that the label "gov't funded" has negative implications. Specifically, that the government controls their content, which is not the case. It's a label that never existed in Twitter until Musk incorrectly labeled NPR as "state affiliated media". That was false, but to save face he changed it to "government-funded media." Again, a new label which was only created so Musk can claim he never backtracked. He just keeps digging a deeper hole by doubling down.
Always what Elon does is bad. Just look at an angle that shows him in bad light.If true, strange how Musk had no problem with it until Microsoft stopped being a Twitter advertiser. But it's probably an Elon.
It's really irrelevant who funds it if the entity funding isn't pulling the strings as far as which stories get promoted and which do not. Similarly, the research of a professor is more a reflection of the research priorities of that one professor and not the university that employs him or her -- that's why the concepts of tenure and academic freedom are so important.Is CBC less than 70% Govt funded or not ?
If it is really irrelevant then why should that label cause such heartburn?It's really irrelevant who funds it if the entity funding isn't pulling the strings as far as which stories get promoted and which do not. Similarly, the research of a professor is more a reflection of the research priorities of that one professor and not the university that employs him or her -- that's why the concepts of tenure and academic freedom are so important.
No, they are afraid the misleading labels will allow certain types to dismiss anything they report as "fake news" or some other such nonsense. Should Elon label Twitter as "Saudi Government Funded" because of their investment?Their reporting and opinions should speak for itself. They are afraid their lack of neutrality will now be seen to have a motive.
And Tesla should be labeled as "PRC government-funded", because it is. Tesla becomes China’s most subsidized EV maker by receiving $325M in 2020No, they are afraid the misleading labels will allow certain types to dismiss anything they report as "fake news" or some other such nonsense. Should Elon label Twitter as "Saudi Government Funded" because of their investment?
If true, strange how Musk had no problem with it until Microsoft stopped being a Twitter advertiser. But it's probably an Elon.
Waiting for the “had the largest settlement ever in a defamation case due to lying” tag.This thing that Elon is doing with these tags aren't exactly bad they're just incomplete. If this is about making a news source's bias known then they should have a link to that news source that goes into the potential biases that that news source might have. This could include government control, party allegiance, dark money etc.
But the way he's using it it looks like he's just trying to slime news sources he doesn't like.
Or is it...Always what Elon does is bad. Just look at an angle that shows him in bad light.
NPR has no government control.Waiting for the “had the largest settlement ever in a defamation case due to lying” tag.
Sales keep increasing.But, that isn't anything new.
If a company fails to innovate and fails to bring out new models then their sales begin to drop.
It is true that its a bit different with EV's which tend to be supply limited, and not demand limited. But, I am concerned that Tesla doesn't really have anything new to offer mainstream buyers.
This won't impact them in the short term, but could in 3-4 years.
Or is it...
Always what Elon does is good. Just look at an angle that shows him in a good light.