Danal
electricmotorglider.com
If you are thinking of Hall Effect sensors, why not use them (or other inductive type sensors) everywhere, so there is absolutely no direct interface with any electrical wiring of the car, negating Tesla arguing that a mod to the car is responsible for a component failure?
1) Still requires physical connection to ground and 12V.
2) Cost/complexity.
3) Literally millions of cars and trucks have wiring harnesses tapped into their tailights. Most commonly for trailer towing. I've even had the car manufacturer's own trailer harness consist of tap-a-con style connectors (the kind you squeeze over a wire and it self-cuts the insulation, but not the conductor wire strands).
4) Artsci's own lighted T taps into those same wires. With the same tap-a-con style connectors (recommended in the instructions, not supplied).
5) The Magnuson-Moss Federal Law. An auto manufacturer can't just 'say' an item caused a failure not covered by warranty. They have to prove it. In court. That law even states that any ambiguity must automatically result in a ruling against the writer of the warranty and that such rulings normally include the writer of the warranty paying the consumer's court costs. Otherwise, the entire 3rd party auto parts industry would not exist.
Having listed all of those cons... I'm open to the idea. It would be rather elegant.
So... swegman... What upcharge would you pay for hall effect sensor on every wire, knowing that you'd also have to pay (or self install) for the additional 12V wire as well? What total price delta would be acceptable for this option?
Last edited: