Ritzcarlton123
Member
Didnt really like the i4. It isn't a fully dedicated ground up EV platform so it doesn't have the packaging a fully EV platform has like flat rear floor for back seat passengers, frunk, etc.
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Check your stats... the Model 3 Performance does 0-60 mph in 3.1 seconds, the BMW i4 M450 in 3. 7 seconds.Quicker than the Performance Model 3.
In the US, fast charging anything other than a Tesla is a lesser experience though. Curious if the P3D will get a small update to increase the top end speed to match or beat this car on a drag strip. 3.5 seconds 0-60 then 8 to 120mph. If they can get 60-120mph down half a second, it would inch out this new BMW
And I personally find the 60-110 time much more relevant for driving than the 0-60 time... I need perf when passing more than I need it from a stoplight.All true but the M50's 60-130 beats the M3P by around 1.5 seconds. Hopefully Elon see this and gives a boost up top lol
Not only that but a boosted long range is actually faster than a performance 3 past about the first 60ft. Giving the Performance 3 the same output as the Performance Y, would solve the problem. Asking Tesla to update the performance to beat the boosted model 3 after 60ft isn't a big askAll true but the M50's 60-130 beats the M3P by around 1.5 seconds. Hopefully Elon see this and gives a boost up top lol
@golfpilot Is that just comparing 100% stock cares because the LR comes with lighter wheels? Or is the LR+AB actually making slightly more power on average at higher speeds?Not only that but a boosted long range is actually faster than a performance 3 past about the first 60ft. Giving the Performance 3 the same output as the Performance Y, would solve the problem. Asking Tesla to update the performance to beat the boosted model 3 after 60ft isn't a big ask
There are a bunch of videos but here are 2.@golfpilot Is that just comparing 100% stock cares because the LR comes with lighter wheels? Or is the LR+AB actually making slightly more power on average at higher speeds?
@golfpilot I don't think either of those videos answers my question. Definitely not the 2nd video with the 18s on the LR. The first one I'm not sure...did they put 19" sport wheels with the same tires on both? Or the old 20" Performance wheels with the same tires on both? Those two wheels look really similar to me, I can't tell if they're both running the same wheels, or if it's 19" vs 20".There are a bunch of videos but here are 2.the second one, the LR walks away from the performance at high speeds
Sound deadening. A modern, active suspension. Interior comfort. It also meets or exceeds the EPA ratings in testing. All unlike Tesla.The Ii4 is a freaking insane 5000lbs mam, thirsty as hell, it's a mega boat in a medium sized package. Insane, did they stuff it with boat anchors?
I assume that you are referring to non-standard range testing. There is no way to know whether a non-governmental testing protocol (magazines, websites, etc.) is biased by who does the testing.It also meets or exceeds the EPA ratings in testing.
With the 19" wheels you're good for 300 miles.I assume that you are referring to non-standard range testing. There is no way to know whether a non-governmental testing protocol (magazines, websites, etc.) is biased by who does the testing.
USEPA, NEDC and WLTP use different mixes of highway and city driving which leads to slightly different results, but at least all vehicles for sale within their respective jurisdictions are tested.
@Jigglypuff True, you get real features and benefits for the extra weight. But whether they're worth it is a matter of priorities. I wouldn't want those for my M3P if it meant 1000 lbs extra weight. Priorities!Sound deadening. A modern, active suspension. Interior comfort. It also meets or exceeds the EPA ratings in testing. All unlike Tesla.