So, now this comment helps bring things back to OT....How does Tesla energy overcome all this corruption? Clearly, NONE of the constituents want this, but many municipalities have been steam rolled into anti-green/energy independent rules by some well payed lobbyists. I understand that this is very political, but this corruption opposes Tesla's energy mission and can potentially slow our PV/storage adoption rate.
Talking about TslaQ, Tslq is red 3 days in a row. I think we need to have a ticker TslqQ because I'm pretty sure that ETF will eventually goes to zero like SQQQ.
Change is linear. There are just discontinuities caused by individual external events that alter the slope.
Are there rules/laws preventing behind-the-meter solar and batteries?
Before TSLQ launched in the US, I was reading about the European equivalents here: https://www.etf.com/sections/featur...-investors-about-single-stock-etfs?nopaging=1
I'll take door #3. Before either of those happen she will be ousted by the board.
This is anecdotal, but I think it is becoming increasingly clear that car ownership amongst younger people is significantly dropping, especially in urban or even suburban settings. And those settings encompass the vast majority of the population in most countries, including America. When kids in my generation turned 15, we were obsessed with the goal of getting a driver's license. It was a virtual rite of passage! Today, for a host of reasons, not so much. So the near and long term future looks very bright for robotaxis. I do agree that it's a less viable solution in rural areas.
Yes the solar covered canals seems like a no brained to do this, slows down evaporation while covering a lot of irrigation land which we have a lot of in the west.
Why is Twitter pushing for an expedited trial? Because it would entail limited discovery by defendant Musk's legal team. That tells me all I need to know about what's going on behind the veil at Twitter. They will fight tooth and nail to avoid revelations about the actual number of bot accounts populating their site. Exposing the truth of those numbers spells doom for Twitter and will spawn massive litigation and even criminal fraud investigations. Given the lack of transparency at Twitter regarding bot accounts, a ruling in favor of plaintiff would be outrageous. An appeal is guaranteed by either side that loses this motion.
The ousting will be retirement so everyone saves face.
insideevs.com
Hardly, Elon would understand the need for a vehicle to haul kids in.
I just don't understand this, if Twitter forces the acquisition then Elon will have access to everything. At that point could he sue and undo the deal because of fraud? (Assuming that there has been fraud.)
Fair point. I would think a legal remedy would be available to him and his investor group, but I don't know. And the flipside of the coin is that Twitter is seeking an expedited trial because they believe they have not hidden anything material and want to enforce the deal. Get your popcorn ready. And maybe a little antacid.
