True...but that is the crux of the last 1 billion words.And, we have come full circle!
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
True...but that is the crux of the last 1 billion words.And, we have come full circle!
Did you look at the "selling" at 11:27 AM today? This is a bear raid, short-style, pure'n'simple. Just look at the volume during the rapid plunges: (7x macros).The selling we see is a good indicator that not everyone is in Tsla for some kind of S&P squeeze.
Not only that, but I still can't get an answer on when the index buying will end. If you follow Gary Black on Twitter, it seems like Friday close. Others suggest buying will go on for several days next week. Knowing what will actually happen would make a big difference on how the next 7 days should be played. I feel like I have my hands tied behind my back because I still don't know....
But why the low volume?Did you look at the "selling" at 11:27 AM today? This is a bear raid, short-style, pure'n'simple. Just look at the volume during the rapid plunges: (7x macros).
View attachment 617989
Nothing to do with shareholders selling; everything to do with scaring weak longs into selling. Every share purchased since 11-30 this morning has been at a discount, courtesy of aggressive shorting.
That's how they manipulate the SP, and control trading.
The one thing US Govt policy could do would be to encourage charging infrastructure. It doesn't look like any of the carmakers are going to tackle it the way Tesla did. It's still the number one reason I wouldn't even consider a non-Tesla EV.
edit: Like Curt said.
A close of ~$639 would only serve to make me more confused by the below screenshot I took this AM.
I'm dumb so likely missing something here. Would a "trade" explain this move?
View attachment 617991
Then again if the Government subsidizes Tesla's super chargers????Actually, the other car makers perhaps have played it smart.
Uncle Sam will cover their costs fully and they can focus on Capexing product only whereby TSLA has been required to divert resources for their network.
I’m not convinced this is a net positive for TSLA stock price.
That's all fine and dandy that Uncle Sam will cover the costs...but the question is how 'long' will this take to implement? The Tesla supercharger network will continue to expand while they twiddle their thumbs fighting on awarding contracts to construct this charging infrastructure.Actually, the other car makers perhaps have played it smart.
Uncle Sam will cover their costs fully and they can focus on Capexing product only whereby TSLA has been required to divert resources for their network.
I’m not convinced this is a net positive for TSLA stock price.
Got that right...I pray that is the case, and that the remaining 96 went to other longs, here or elsewhere
Lol, having a 15 year head start is a net positive for Tesla...Actually, the other car makers perhaps have played it smart.
Uncle Sam will cover their costs fully and they can focus on Capexing product only whereby TSLA has been required to divert resources for their network.
I’m not convinced this is a net positive for TSLA stock price.
I would HOPE that a subset of these chargers would be Tesla-compatible. Either that or Tesla finally provides CCS-Tesla adapters. This would at least speed the effective expansion of Tesla-compatible infrastructure at little expense (to Tesla).Actually, the other car makers perhaps have played it smart.
Uncle Sam will cover their costs fully and they can focus on Capexing product only whereby TSLA has been required to divert resources for their network.
I’m not convinced this is a net positive for TSLA stock price.
Presumably they will warehouse them in Berlin and use a small amount to build test cars.So where do Fremont Road Runner 4680's go? I thought conventional wisdom was they would go to Berlin for the startup?
Actually, the other car makers perhaps have played it smart.
Uncle Sam will cover their costs fully and they can focus on Capexing product only whereby TSLA has been required to divert resources for their network.
I’m not convinced this is a net positive for TSLA stock price.
What does that even mean? It's barely comprehensible. Sounds like they became breathless just from typing.
I can't imagine Tesla is will build anywhere in England. What would be the point? It's not an enormous market. It does not have easy access to raw materials. It may or may not have access to the European market without trade barriers. Labor is not especially inexpensive. Logistics for supply chain and deliveries cannot be better than somewhere in central Europe. It might give easier export access to USA, but we'll have plenty of terafactories here to service the domestic market. I don't understand the play.
100% chance they won't be Tesla-compatible (without a Tesla supplied adapter). However, speed of implementation, quality of maintenance (I suspect set 'em and forget 'em), power available at each stall, and quantity of charging stalls at each location will play a big part. I don't expect miracles here. Worst case a Federal tax for every EV owner to pay for this.I would HOPE that a subset of these chargers would be Tesla-compatible. Either that or Tesla finally provides CCS-Tesla adapters. This would at least speed the effective expansion of Tesla-compatible infrastructure at little expense (to Tesla).