That’s only true if company T is lowering all prices of all variants of said widget. If they, instead, say, lower the price of one widget and raise the price of another, then it could be about shifting demand towards the former and away from the latter. Which could be, for example, because that gives a more optimal production mix and optimizes their costs to produce all widgets as a whole.
-
Want to remove ads? Register an account and login to see fewer ads, and become a Supporting Member to remove almost all ads.
Tesla, TSLA & the Investment World: the Perpetual Investors' Roundtable
- Thread starter AudubonB
- Start date
That’s only true if company T is lowering all prices of all variants of said widget. If they, instead, say, lower the price of one widget and raise the price of another, then it could be about shifting demand towards the former and away from the latter. Which could be, for example, because that gives a more optimal production mix and optimizes their costs to produce all widgets as a whole.
$1.00 / mile would be cheap enough that all Teslas combined can’t fulfill demand.
This does only apply as long as only Tesla has robo-taxis or until there are enough Teslas on the road to drive down the price.
The demand for an autonomous EV low cost robo-taxi will be insane.
Let’s pretend, for a second, that it works that way. What you’re saying here, then, is that Elon cannot send any email on these topics to anyone, ever. That includes the counsel who would need to approve the statements, the people actually running the production, etc. He’s essentially not allowed to have anything to do with production at his own company. Oh, and not just Elon, the agreement applies to all officers of the company. So nobody is allowed to actually run Tesla. Does that sound reasonable to you?
FreqFlyer, do you believe the emails were intentionally leaked?
I am asking because I don't believe anyone here
a very sharp group...
nobody here believes these are Unintentional leaks.
Edit: omitted keyword "unintentional"
I am asking because I don't believe anyone here
a very sharp group...
nobody here believes these are Unintentional leaks.
Edit: omitted keyword "unintentional"
EVNow
Well-Known Member
Because the company promised to sell the widget for $0.99 and they want to honor that commitment ?
EVNow
Well-Known Member
Doesn't have to be intentionally leaked. If in the past all the company wide emails have been leaked, EM knows this will be too.
Not just Tesla, almost all company wide emails by CEOs of high profile companies are leaked.
Drumheller
Active Member
Very helpful response! And I think that's likely what happened. My first post on this was before the recent Model 3 price raises. My impression is that Tesla is facing a bit of a demand issue with S and X, but not so with Model 3.
Thanks!
Report the post. Personal attacks should get ban hammer, not just ignored.
shrspeedblade
Rideshare Monkey
That was not my experience two months ago. Was actually stumped at first and then remembered where I was. Verizon on the international pay per day plan.
sundaymorning
Active Member
I think with the new info on demand and 900/week production effectively puts a floor on how low shirts can push the stock down at around $190. It will take a couple days for this bit of good news to sink in before reports of crazy deliveries, all hands on deck starts to come out.
EVNow
Well-Known Member
This is beyond absurd.
It basically shows the absurd nature of SEC claims, too. The correct remedy should have been to just ask Musk not to tweet anything material without prior disclosure during market hours.
Any interviews he gives, conference calls (like the cap raise ones) always have some material information. SEC (and others) never cry about those - because it is the "norm" for the industry. But tweets being new, are somehow treated differently.
EVNow
Well-Known Member
I hope they don't do another delivery hell. They need to stop doing it - it really hurts customer service.
I can understand delivering may be 2x normal deliveries in 3rd month - but should not require all hands on deck etc.
Pezpunk
Active Member
you can't ban a person from talking about his own company to his own employees, wtf is this nonsense?
if it is a routine, everything leaks...
where are the goods from
engineering/production/QC/Shipping/Sales/service?
Business is war
Elon is doing what he thinks he has to do.
Found a loophole, using it.
where are the goods from
engineering/production/QC/Shipping/Sales/service?
Business is war
Elon is doing what he thinks he has to do.
Found a loophole, using it.
All emails written to employees are intentional.
Emails getting leaked are a Fact.
To Use the fact to one's own advantage is genius
(kudos to the employee who leaked it)I didn't hear any Longs complaining about the previous email (even though it bought the SP down like $30)?
StealthP3D
Well-Known Member
It looks like the SEC settlement can't muzzle a smart man who is intent on getting the word out!
A win for the First Amendment!
All emails written to employees are intentional.
Emails getting leaked are a Fact.
To Use the fact to one's own advantage is genius
I didn't hear any Longs complaining about the previous email (even though it bought the SP down like $30)?
To be fair, I complained about the verbiage in the last e-mail. The content was poorly framed, taken out of context or not.
CNBC doing its usual bashing. It is just non-stop. I believe they are about to have clickbait hungry Consumer Reports on to regurgitate its auto-pilot story from yesterday. Is this really a top, newsworthy story on a day when markets are crashing (especially as this is yesterday's news)?
Similar threads
- Locked
- Locked
- Locked
