Was this the one that filed an injunction?Good news, looks like the Solar City lawsuit is a total sham:
SolarCity sued by Cogenra Solar and Khosla Ventures
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Was this the one that filed an injunction?Good news, looks like the Solar City lawsuit is a total sham:
SolarCity sued by Cogenra Solar and Khosla Ventures
I actually don't think it'll matter. This is based on studying the late 19th century; there were some huge macroeconomic downturns (the "Long Depression") but the successful "new technology" companies (like Standard Oil) made out like bandits.
Not watching the debate, but futures are responding favorably. Anything interesting going on?
Is it possible for a brokerage (say Fidelity) to short a portion of their own long shares as a hedge? Thought I read about it somewhere. Figure they wouldn't have to pay brokerage fees and interest, since they "lent" themselves their own shares to short (and wouldn't violate naked shorting rules).
Obviously lending to shorts is safer, but wondering if they can do that too.
Also since it's getting to the end of the quarter, wouldn't the funds prefer not to lend out their shares to short to bring up their share price and thus their overall market value?
I am not averse to some end of quarter 'window-dressing' by fund managers if it benefits TSLA.Is it possible for a brokerage (say Fidelity) to short a portion of their own long shares as a hedge? Thought I read about it somewhere. Figure they wouldn't have to pay brokerage fees and interest, since they "lent" themselves their own shares to short (and wouldn't violate naked shorting rules).
Obviously lending to shorts is safer, but wondering if they can do that too.
Also since it's getting to the end of the quarter, wouldn't the funds prefer not to lend out their shares to short to bring up their share price and thus their overall market value?
Was this the one that filed an injunction?
The Real Reason Investors Are Backing the Tesla-SolarCity Deal
"The plaintiffs, who own undisclosed amounts but aren’t among the major owners, are the City of Riviera Beach Pension Fund in Florida, the Arkansas Teacher Retirement System and individual investors P. Evan Stephens and Ellen Prasinos."
The only plaintiff of note is the Arkansas Teacher Retirement System with over $14B in assets under management. But I can't find how many TSLA shares they own.
Are you referring to the 4 entities that are trying to block the merger?
Here's @RobStark post about it:
Short-Term TSLA Price Movements - 2016
So I don't see them (Sunpower, et al.) listed as any of the entities trying to block.
This at least strongly imply that solar shingle/roof is not just a science project but a serious commercially viable product. Otherwise, why fight for it?Good news, looks like the Solar City lawsuit is a total sham:
SolarCity sued by Cogenra Solar and Khosla Ventures
There's *always* a volume flurry at the last minute in every single stock every single day. It's a known thing in the stock markets. Dunno why!
Okay here is a close up of hollow red inverted hammer doji which is an extremely bullish potential reversal candle, please note how orderly this pullback has been within the last 5 quarters and is finding support right at 13 Quarter EMA (blue solid line). this is as bullish as it gets. all the weak hands have been shaken out and frustrated longs have exited, recalcitrant shorts are betting against TSLA and paying interest through the nose, this scenario is stock market equivalent of a mine of dynamite just waiting for the fuse to be lit up, and i suspect the catalyst will be next week delivery #sCan you post a chart of what you're seeing?
This at least strongly imply that solar shingle/roof is not just a science project but a serious commercially viable product. Otherwise, why fight for it?
In the upcoming reveal on 28th, I am looking forward to the details on:
1) Cost
2) Efficiency
3) Production ramp plans at the Buffalo plant.
Clearly an upside down dealJust a small data point here, but a friend of a friend of mine has just bought their MS. As reported here by others, Tesla is pushing hard on its discounts that will end at the end of this month, and likely won't repeat this method for a very very long time (maybe never again?). The receipt attached to this post shows a few dashed lines, some of the dashed lines on the receipt are freebies that Tesla threw in as options. Also, their sales team stated that it has been epically crazy the last few weeks
"here is the long legged monthly hammer" -- sounds like a girl I used to know.here is the long legged monthly hammer which so far portends a significant reversal in TSLA
Emphasis : potential
Nothing is written in stone in the stock market
and it just so happens that Fidelity is also the #1 shareholder of SCTY. but we just watched SCTY take a nearly 40% drop in a month with an offer on the table much higher. If Fidelity's SCTY holdings are reported and it shows they dumped SCTY... then this may be a sign that Fidelity is exiting "Elon".
IMHO quite many things wrong with your post. Lets pick to this one :
Why would Fidelity dump SCTY shares at a price below the fixed conversion rate, and at the same time be in support of the merger ?
One of Tesla's Biggest Investors Throws Support Behind SolarCity Deal
IMHO : you might be spreading FUD.
Okay here is a close up of hollow red inverted hammer doji which is an extremely bullish potential reversal candle...-
IMHO quite many things wrong with your post. Lets pick to this one :
Why would Fidelity dump SCTY shares at a price below the fixed conversion rate, and at the same time be in supportive of the merger ?
One of Tesla's Biggest Investors Throws Support Behind SolarCity Deal
IMHO : you might be spreading FUD.