You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Interesting data point from X June delivery thread (bolding by me):
Picked up our regular Model X yesterday from the factory. All went smoothly. I think they have it down to a science. Took about an hour since we asked a lot of questions and went over every detail of the car and menus.
My guess is that they processed about 20 Model X's for delivery yesterday at the factory. They do it in a big tent and can probably do 40 to 50 easily a day. I suspect that they are really getting ready to ramp up the production and delivery process from everything I saw on sight and during the tour.
Giving away capacity does hurt margins. Either it lowers existing margins or it reduces or eliminates a potential improvement in margins.
Sigh. Every cloud has a toxic lining.Any word on more Service Centers, especially in California? They are going to need to build out support for all these deliveries.
As noted, this is part of their strategy to man up for M3. They can't hire the new line staff in a day. They will likely run 3 shifts til M3 and then break out staff to the new line as they start ramping. Lower avg selling price margins may also be compensated for by increasing return on fixed investment costs and pressure Panasonic to move at the gigafactory.Giving away capacity does hurt margins. Either it lowers existing margins or it reduces or eliminates a potential improvement in margins.
As noted, this is part of their strategy to man up for M3. They can't hire the new line staff in a day. They will likely run 3 shifts til M3 and then break out staff to the new line as they start ramping. Lower avg selling price margins may also be compensated for by increasing return on fixed investment costs and pressure Panasonic to move at the gigafactory.
I'm all for sacrificing a point or two of margin to be at 1mm vehicles before a competitor is producing 50,000 vehicles. They will have the EV scale advantage in all key areas over their mature competition.
Just interested because:Sigh. Every cloud has a toxic lining.
Such a negative response to good news
But they're not giving it away - no dilution of current market by discounting, they're just expanding the market by offering a cheaper product with a really cool upgrade feature that is likely to bring in future revenue at minimal effort. I suspect most of the people who received S40s are going to pay off their loans and then buy the upgrade to a 60. Those who buy the 75 dba 60, will probably do the same thing.I don't disagree with any of that, only with the claim that giving a way a large portion of a major component will not affect margins. It will to some degree.
My prediction, Elon and JB will be the first to launch an economically viable EP (electric plane).Motors (TSLA) helped lead the revolution to bring electric cars to roads, and now NASA wants to bring commercially viable electric planes to the sky.
NASA will develop the X-57 by modifying a recently procured, Italian-designed Tecnam P2006T twin-engine light aircraft, according to a statement. The wing and two gas-fueled engines will be replaced with a long, skinny wing embedded with 14 electric motors.
NASA Administrator Charles Bolden said the X-57 is nicknamed "Maxwell," for Scottish physicist James Clerk Maxwell, who did work in electromagnetism. Similarly, Tesla Motors is named for electrical engineer and physicist Nikola Tesla, whose design for an electric motor was adapted for the Tesla Roadster.
NASA hopes the X-57 will demonstrate "advanced technologies to reduce fuel use, emissions and noise, and thus accelerate their introduction into the market place."
NASA today unveiled plans to spend the next decade working on electric planes under the ‘X-57’ moniker. The X-Plane program has traditionally been used by NASA to further aviation so this is a big deal more than just a pet project or some 3D renders.
The plane which is also called ‘Maxwell’ to honor James Clerk Maxwell, the 19th century Scottish physicist who did groundbreaking work in electromagnetism, will be based on the Italian Tecnam P2006T, a very efficient 4 seat light aircraft (pictured above). NASA will do away with the wing and petrol engines and replace them with a super-efficient thinner wing and 14 electric motors. The smaller 12 motors will only be used for takeoffs and what we can probably assume is regen during landings. The larger 2 engines on the end of the wings will propel the plane during cruising which is expected to be a solid 175mph. The Tecnam has retractable wheels and a 1500-foot take off distance which should make it a good base for an EV makeover.
What's going to change is battery technology, probably led by TeslaThe target NASA had in its sights seemed impossibly distant, and yet it required the designs to be flight-ready in five years (by 2020). NASA’s design objective for the competition was a four-seat airplane with a range of 800 nautical miles (921 statute miles, or 1,482 km) and a cruising speed of 175 knots (equal to 201 mph, or 323 km/h). And while most designers might scoff at such a challenge, seeing these specs as completely normal, the goals were more than seven times as far and twice as fast as the brand new Pipistrel Alpha Electro electric airplane could go. Quick math shows that the NASA performance targets demand about 30 times as much energy as the Pipistrel is capable of providing. What could change so drastically in five years so as to allow that?
NASA's 'Maxwell' Electric Plane Could Launch Air Tesla
My prediction, Elon and JB will be the first to launch an economically viable EP (electric plane).
Another link:
NASA will spend the next 4 years innovating electric passenger plane transport with the 175mph ‘X-57’
New 60 may have reduced margin but it increases addressable market by quite a lot. It will bring more revenue over time as some customers will be enticed to upgrade. I also suspect a lot of those will be leases, which means than when they come back to Tesla in 3 years, they instantly become 75 to be sold as such for the price of a badge change, so they will get whatever amount of extra money back at that time.
Excellent post Papafox! Have a great Hawaii Saturday late morning.
Edit: you're right: the last thing the smart shorts had left was a delivery miss, which won't happen.
I am cautiously optimistic. All of us that have been readers/contributors to the ST thread over the last few years have seen lots of FUD perpetrated by people and businesses with deep pockets.
Long term TSLA will be a good investment. Be careful with short term investments and predictions.
I am a long term bull with stocks and leaps but I have just a little invested in short term options....
I appreciate your view AlMc because the short-term is so dang hard to predict with TSLA. My hope is that if the shorts can pull TSLA below 215 that some of our longs don't sell out of fear, because I think any dip would be short-lived. Personally, I'm optimistic that we're soon going to be moving in an upward direction.
I appreciate your view AlMc because the short-term is so dang hard to predict with TSLA. My hope is that if the shorts can pull TSLA below 215 that some of our longs don't sell out of fear, because I think any dip would be short-lived. Personally, I'm optimistic that we're soon going to be moving in an upward direction.