Welcome to Tesla Motors Club
Discuss Tesla's Model S, Model 3, Model X, Model Y, Cybertruck, Roadster and More.
Register

Russia/Ukraine conflict

This site may earn commission on affiliate links.
"


Spoken through a political lens.....closing the border is the solution & which the current Administration has failed to properly administer. US cities are being overrun by folks coming unbridled through the border (I am a 1st gen Immigrant & my family entered legally).

International trade across the US-Mexico border is huge. $650 million in commerce a day, over $230 billion a year. The border crossing at Tijuana was closed for a week a few years ago and US manufacturing started shutting down.

Quick Facts about the U.S.-Mexico Border

The number of illegal immigrants in the US has not changed much since about 2005. The number of Mexicans in the mix has declined as job opportunities have opened up in Mexico. Mexicans who were once illegals are returning home. These people are being replaced by people from other countries. On the west coast there are a fair number of Chinese illegals who are coming in via container ships.

What we know about unauthorized immigrants living in the U.S.

A large percentage of illegals work as farm labor. The immigrants coming to the cities are not illegals, they are people seeking asylum in the US. Under the law, when someone is seeking asylum they have the right to stay here until their case can be heard. Because the courts are backed up (Congress has not allocated funding to hire more judges), it can take years for someone's case to be heard.

Over the last couple of years what the Border Patrol calls "encounters" at the border have skyrocketed because people are crossing the border then turning themselves in to the first authority they find. If someone makes it across the border before they are apprehended, their case must be heard.

The laws surrounding these things can change, but Congress hasn't done anything about it. Most Democrats have shown a willingness to address the problems in a rational manner, but any attempts to fix anything get the goal posts moved by the Republicans and nothing gets passed.
 
International trade across the US-Mexico border is huge. $650 million in commerce a day, over $230 billion a year. The border crossing at Tijuana was closed for a week a few years ago and US manufacturing started shutting down.

Quick Facts about the U.S.-Mexico Border

The number of illegal immigrants in the US has not changed much since about 2005. The number of Mexicans in the mix has declined as job opportunities have opened up in Mexico. Mexicans who were once illegals are returning home. These people are being replaced by people from other countries. On the west coast there are a fair number of Chinese illegals who are coming in via container ships.

What we know about unauthorized immigrants living in the U.S.

A large percentage of illegals work as farm labor. The immigrants coming to the cities are not illegals, they are people seeking asylum in the US. Under the law, when someone is seeking asylum they have the right to stay here until their case can be heard. Because the courts are backed up (Congress has not allocated funding to hire more judges), it can take years for someone's case to be heard.

Over the last couple of years what the Border Patrol calls "encounters" at the border have skyrocketed because people are crossing the border then turning themselves in to the first authority they find. If someone makes it across the border before they are apprehended, their case must be heard.

The laws surrounding these things can change, but Congress hasn't done anything about it. Most Democrats have shown a willingness to address the problems in a rational manner, but any attempts to fix anything get the goal posts moved by the Republicans and nothing gets passed.
Congress had a chance to fund more border security along with Ukraine and they refused just scant weeks ago. Not hard to tell what the agenda really is.
 
Not far from the 341,500 number of DEAD Russian serfs that the Armed Forces of UKR claims...

U.S. intelligence assesses Ukraine war has cost Russia 315,000 casualties - source

By Jonathan Landay
December 13, 2023 12:51 AM GMT+1 Updated a day ago

WASHINGTON, Dec 12 (Reuters) - A declassified U.S. intelligence report assessed that the Ukraine war has cost Russia 315,000 dead and injured troops, or nearly 90% of the personnel it had when the conflict began, a source familiar with the intelligence said on Tuesday.

The report also assessed that Moscow's losses in personnel and armored vehicles to Ukraine's military have set back Russia’s military modernization by 18 years, the source said. [...


twitter.com/NOELreports/status/1734821517962174772

 
Can't find any other source for this yet, but according to Denys at 16:26 in the vid below, Germany "may" declare some sort of financial emergency and increase their debt to guarantee adequate funding for UKR if needed. So it seems all of Europe (except the usual traitors in Hungary, Slovakia, Austria and Switzerland) will continue to support UKR. South Korea, Japan, Australia and New Zeeland seems to be on board as well. Hopefully Canada and the US will also come to their 'collective senses'.

Europe et al. should be able to just buy weapons and ammo from the US if needed – or?...

 
Can't find any other source for this yet, but according to Denys at 16:26 in the vid below, Germany "may" declare some sort of financial emergency and increase their debt to guarantee adequate funding for UKR if needed. So it seems all of Europe (except the usual traitors in Hungary, Slovakia, Austria and Switzerland) will continue to support UKR. South Korea, Japan, Australia and New Zeeland seems to be on board as well. Hopefully Canada and the US will also come to their 'collective senses'.

Europe et al. should be able to just buy weapons and ammo from the US if needed – or?...


Unfortunately arms deals need Congressional notification and Congress can block sales.

You make it sound like Democrats are doing it out of the kindness of their heart. Democrats want to hand out citizenship to as many immigrants as possible, put them on government benefits, and increase their voter count.

That's what one end of the media spectrum would like you to think, but it's more difficult for immigrants to get government benefits and most don't apply for them even when they do qualify.

https://www.nilc.org/issues/economic-support/overview-immeligfedprograms/

The Democrats don't really need more voters, especially in the states where most of these immigrants are settling. In the last 8 presidential elections the Democratic candidate has gotten more votes than the Republican in 7 of them. If it wasn't for the way senators are allocated, gerrymandered districts in many states, and the electoral college, Democrats would have had a solid lock on the federal government for 30 years.
 
Something happened yesterday. The Ukrainians are reporting 1300 Russians killed
Casualties of Russia in Ukraine - official data

That isn't the biggest one day total. On Oct 23 the Russians lost 1380, but this is the second highest daily losses. The vehicle and equipment losses are not that high, so the Russians must have done something like a suicide charge at the Ukrainian lines.
 
Do you think Congress would block arms sales to their NATO allies in the EU?

No, but as we have seen with Germany, the sales have provisions that prevent transfer to other countries. So if you were thinking that UKR can receive US arms via a NATO middle-man, I'm skeptical unless the US wants to let it happen. Of course, the USA **loves** to be the world's military supplier. The profits are gigantic.

The Republican opposition is mostly a circus, but it is predicated on the vague idea that Americans should not pay for UKR defense. Selling arms for profit is presumably (?) OK by them.
 
Last edited:
No, but as we have seen with Germany, the sales have provisions that prevent transfer to other countries. So if you were thinking that UKR can receive US arms via a NATO middle-man, I'm skeptical unless the US wants to let it happen. Of course, the USA **loves** to be the world's military supplier. The profits are gigantic.

The Republican opposition is mostly a circus, but it is predicated on the vague idea that Americans should not pay for UKR defense. Selling arms for profit is presumably (?) OK by them.

Ok. So take this as an example. Assuming that the following is correct, "Estonia provides Ukraine with a new military aid package worth €80 million. It includes Javelin anti-tank missiles [My u.], machine guns, ammunition for light weaponry, various vehicles and vessels and diving equipment." See the tweet below.

So there doesn't seem to be any obstacles for transferring US made weapons to UKR...

twitter.com/NOELreports/status/1735276857224814704

 
Allegedly:

While Putin is continuing his fairy tales about Ukraine, Russians are asking real questions:

"Why does a tray of eggs cost 550 rubles in Dagestan?"

"Mister President, when will the reality in Russia not be different from what is told on television?"

"Why is your reality different with our reality?"


twitter.com/NOELreports/status/1735239315477655932

 
Something happened yesterday. The Ukrainians are reporting 1300 Russians killed
Casualties of Russia in Ukraine - official data

That isn't the biggest one day total. On Oct 23 the Russians lost 1380, but this is the second highest daily losses. The vehicle and equipment losses are not that high, so the Russians must have done something like a suicide charge at the Ukrainian lines.

Yeah they're trying to take Avdiivka using the Bakhmut strategy. i.e emptying out their prisons and marching them at Ukraine until Ukraine runs out of bullets.
 
If Russia is truly using large quanities of prisoners and ethnic minorities to staff their front lines, then in the eyes of many in Moscow, those losses are really not a big issue.
If Russia is using mostly their older, outdated and obsolete armor, then that loss, also, will not be considered as a huge loss. After the war, they can simply restock their reserves with more updated weaponry. Stockpiles of old ammunition is cheaper to dispose of against the enemy, than to safely decommission it due to age.
 
If Russia is truly using large quanities of prisoners and ethnic minorities to staff their front lines, then in the eyes of many in Moscow, those losses are really not a big issue.
If Russia is using mostly their older, outdated and obsolete armor, then that loss, also, will not be considered as a huge loss. After the war, they can simply restock their reserves with more updated weaponry. Stockpiles of old ammunition is cheaper to dispose of against the enemy, than to safely decommission it due to age.

True. So they should call this a special recycling operation.