Welcome to Tesla Motors Club
Discuss Tesla's Model S, Model 3, Model X, Model Y, Cybertruck, Roadster and More.
Register

Russia/Ukraine conflict

This site may earn commission on affiliate links.
The Roosevelt administration spent 4 years preparing and planning for wwii. Every calculation was carefully weighed and the army and air force and navy were being redesigned for the coming war. It was considered completely unavoidable. WWI- yes avoided til we couldn’t. WWII- not the case at all but this is not really the thread for historical retrospective of events 90 years ago.

The US started rearming in 1937, but there was a very strong isolationist sentiment that had to be overcome too. Rossevelt was more of a realist than Wilson, but the American people wanted to stay out of both wars until things forced the country's hand.
 
ISW is reporting that the Russians are attempting an offensive. That's probably why Russian losses have gone up the last few days.
Institute for the Study of War

Another 900+ Russians dead. Third day in a row with these kinds of losses.
https://www.mil.gov.ua/en/news/2023...osses-of-the-enemy-from-24-02-22-to-09-02-23/

Some sources are saying that the Russians are throwing 100,000 troops into this offensive. The Ukrainians have been holding the line for three days now. I expect they will probably lose some ground just from the sheer weight of Russian bodies being thrown at them, but the Russians will pay a steep price for every meter and then the Russian offensive will start to falter when they start running out of supply or they struggle to move the supply they have on hand.

Assaults consume tremendous mountains of supply and as the troops move forward, the supply train needs to keep up. Russia has shown weak logistics when it comes to moving supply the last leg from the railhead to the frontline. Russia's rail is very good at getting supply near the front. They have an entire branch of the military dedicated to the railroads. But they started the war with too few trucks, have lost a staggering number of the trucks they had, plus after a year a lot of the surviving trucks are wearing out. They have pressed civilian trucks into service, but those aren't equipped for the types of conditions battlefield trucks have to face and their life expectancy is probably pretty low. Because of its rail network Russia has a small civilian truck fleet for the size of the country.

When the supplies run out, the offensive stalls. Operation Bagration was probably one of the largest single battles in history. To keep the Germans tied down on the Eastern Front and give the western Allies a chance in France the Soviets launched a massive assault on Germany's Army Group Center in August 1944. Zhukov piled up a staggering mountain of supplies for the operation and had a massive fleet of American built trucks to move it.

The Russians blasted a hole in the German line close to 1000 miles long and pretty much obliterated Army Group Center, which was a massive force of about 850,000 men. The German casualties range from 150K to 500K depending on the estimate. Russian casualties were around 770K.

Army Group Central was devastated and nothing stood in the way between the Russians and Berlin, but they burned up so much supply and took so many casualties on the initial assault they couldn't exploit the opportunity and the Germans had time to regroup and build a new defensive line.

Operation Bagration - Wikipedia

It all boils down to logistics in the end. And Russian logistics once away from rail lines in the last 100 years have never been very good.

ISW suggests that Russia may be handing over the frontlines to DNR and LNR units to free up Russian units for their offensive. That exact thing happened 81 years ago when the Russians were bogged down in a massive attritional fight at Stalingrad. The Germans stripped out all their units holding the flanks at Stalingrad and threw them into the cauldron in the city. They gave the responsibility to holding their flanks to the weaker Hungarian, Italian, and Romanian units fighting with the German army. Zhukov took advantage of this once he had built up enough forces and supplies to conduct a Russian offensive. He attacked the German's flanks and broke through the weak forces holding them. This allowed the Russians to surround the city and trap the German 6th Army inside the perimeter.

In Igor Girkin's latest interview he was talking about how the Russian don't have enough of anything to go over onto the offensive successfully. He's very pro-Russian, but he's also the most realistic of the commentators on the Russian side. In his estimation the Russians don't have the supplies for a full offensive and the troops are too poorly trained to sustain an offensive.

I expect the Russians will make some gains in the offensive, and there will be plenty of hand wringing that Ukraine is doomed and/or "see the Russians were just sandbagging". But the offensive will fall apart and the Russians will then have a much weaker force to defend against the next Ukrainian offensive. If the Russian flanks are being held by LNR and DNR forces exclusively, expect there to be the point for the Ukrainian offensive.
Great analysis thank you.

Sh**** is going down in Russia. First cracks.
Click the translation link.

 
I'm no expert, but perhaps there's a way to sufficiently beef upp the front landing gear on the F-16. Maybe all it takes is some other titanium alloy, or some incrementally beefier landing gear parts. Maybe the manufacturer has been working on something that could be implemented in a couple of weeks...

Isn't the main gear strong enough as is?
Problem is- the more Putin is in a corner the more the Chinese step in. They seem to use this war as a means of powerplay to fogbomb their latest activities and to arm wrestle their international power.
At the same time they have him by his biscuits in the Mongolian region.

This is turning into a triangle.
 
The journal of foreign affairs had a lengthy piece on the need to prevent a Iran-Russia/China triangle- written maybe 20 years ago? Before I left govt service I almost sure because I read them in whatever embassy I had been in at the time. someone could find it if they wanted to see what real experts were thinking... not YouTube or Twitter experts .

So Russian offensive , cold weather for 1 month, then it warms- mud season , wait til June when hopefully Ukraine has mobility and AirPower to protect the next major counteroffensive
 
I'm no expert, but perhaps there's a way to sufficiently beef upp the front landing gear on the F-16. Maybe all it takes is some other titanium alloy, or some incrementally beefier landing gear parts. Maybe the manufacturer has been working on something that could be implemented in a couple of weeks...

Isn't the main gear strong enough as is?
Problem is- the more Putin is in a corner the more the Chinese step in. They seem to use this war as a means of powerplay to fogbomb their latest activities and to arm wrestle their international power.
At the same time they have him by his biscuits in the Mongolian region.

This is turning into a triangle.

1. As I understand it Ukraine is asking the Democratic West for some 180 modern Western fighter jets.
2. Support in the Democratic West for supplying UKR with modern fighter jets is growing fast. As a layman on things like these I am fully behind this growing support for providing modern Western fighter jets to UKR.

I say let UKR decide and not the Chinese Dictator.
 
So would you say those pacifists are making "the world a better place" when it comes to the situation in Ukraine?
If they engage the trigger-happy hawks in a dialog that prevents escalation, yes, I would.
Extremes and generalizations lead to easy answers, but not always the best answers.

Like this perhaps:
pacifism
noun
  1. the belief that war and violence are unjustifiable and that all disputes should be settled by peaceful means.

I think petit_bateau said it well:
A world with fewer weapons, and those weapons in responsible mature disciplined hands subject to checks & balances and proper accountability to the rule of law, would be vastly preferable. That's not pacifism, that's reality. Unfortunately most so-called "pacifists" don't think through all of the issues in the imperfect world we live in, and that leads to some rather strange positions at moments like these. [...

@CatB: IMO it is absolutely 100% possible to reach "the best answers" without engaging with a pacifist that adheres to pacifism.
 
It is 4x the normal rates so maybe counterbattery radar improved or something else new.
The recent video footage suggests a lot of direct hits by Ukraine on Russian artillery, from smart munitions with long range drone surveillance in-the-loop. Maybe that is cued by counterbattery radar, but the sheer quantity of drone footage is itself remarkable. I get the sense that the smart munitions are being prioritised to anti-artillery usage.

If one were carrying out a systems analysis one might note that drone video can direct artillery against all target sets, including AFV/IFV/tanks + fixed positions + infantry + artillery. Whereas counterbattery radar is really only good against one target set. So skewing investments towards drone surveillance might be a better ROI. Again if one looks at the recent video footage an awful lot of the Ukraine artillery is against those other target sets. Even when it non-smart it is clearly being walked in onto target very quickly. The Ukraine recce teams are clearly well integrated with their artillery teams these days.

The current Russian losses are staggering. The Russians are using the classic Soviet tactic of attacking on a wide front and trying to find a weakness to flow behind. But so far that does not appear to be working for the Russians in terms of opening up a weakness to exploit, and let's hope it stays that way. Surely it cannot last much longer before they run out of anyone/anything.
 

Why do other countries give a [beep] about what the Swiss think? Poland didn't seem to give a [beep] about what Germany thought, and was going to supply UKR with Leopard tanks anyway... Isn't it abundantly clear by now that any weapons from Swiss arms manufacturers are going to be utterly useless anyway once the existing ammo and spare parts are exhausted... If Germany, Spain and Denmark intends to maintain some sort of defense capability going forward, those Swiss weapons are going to have to be replaced anyway. Seems to me that the potential market for any arms from a Swiss manufacturer[1] has been extremely effectively confined within the borders of Switzerland for the foreseeable future... Or am I missing something?

[1] And similar 'market restrictions' seems to apply for any weapons manufactured by any corporation in Austria or Hungary...
 
Last edited:
Why do other countries give a [beep] about what the Swiss think? Poland didn't seem to give a [beep] about what Germany thought, and was going to supply UKR with Leopard tanks anyway... Isn't it abundantly clear by now that any weapons from Swiss arms manufacturers are going to utterly useless anyway once the existing ammo and spare parts are exhausted...
Maybe that's why they want Swiss support, so they can get parts and ammo?
 
The recent video footage suggests a lot of direct hits by Ukraine on Russian artillery, from smart munitions with long range drone surveillance in-the-loop. Maybe that is cued by counterbattery radar, but the sheer quantity of drone footage is itself remarkable. I get the sense that the smart munitions are being prioritised to anti-artillery usage.

If one were carrying out a systems analysis one might note that drone video can direct artillery against all target sets, including AFV/IFV/tanks + fixed positions + infantry + artillery. Whereas counterbattery radar is really only good against one target set. So skewing investments towards drone surveillance might be a better ROI. Again if one looks at the recent video footage an awful lot of the Ukraine artillery is against those other target sets. Even when it non-smart it is clearly being walked in onto target very quickly. The Ukraine recce teams are clearly well integrated with their artillery teams these days.

The current Russian losses are staggering. The Russians are using the classic Soviet tactic of attacking on a wide front and trying to find a weakness to flow behind. But so far that does not appear to be working for the Russians in terms of opening up a weakness to exploit, and let's hope it stays that way. Surely it cannot last much longer before they run out of anyone/anything.
So they are redirecting Excalibur’s to anti artillery? Wise
 

"Russia is draining a massive Ukrainian reservoir, endangering a nuclear plant​

February 10, 2023 5:00 AM ET

Russia appears to be draining an enormous reservoir in Ukraine, imperiling drinking water, agricultural production and safety at Europe's largest nuclear plant, according to satellite data obtained by NPR.

Since early November 2022, water has been gushing out of the Kakhovka Reservoir, in Southern Ukraine, through sluice gates at a critical hydroelectric power plant controlled by Russian forces. As a result, satellite data shows that the water level at the reservoir has plummeted to its lowest point in three decades. [..."