About a month ago, while I was out of town, we had several severe storms. I lost a router, an ethernet switch, and even one of my inverters. All were behind my Powerwalls, and I thought it was odd that equipment behind the Powerwalls could be damaged. I have six Powerwalls, so my protected circuits rarely see the grid.
Two Thousand dollars in repair costs later, today we are having another severe storm, and I think I understand what happened. In today's case, my Powerwalls were charged to 99%. We went into Storm Watch, and the system diverted grid power to power the home. Under this scenario, any severe surge in power can now get past the gateway and damage equipment, whereas, without Storm Watch being activated, the system would be running off the Powerwalls as usual and would be isolated from surges. I have turned off Storm Watch because of this.
I think Storm Watch is useful if you need to charge your Powerwalls prior to an event that could result in a grid outage, but when it's active in the middle of a severe storm, I think it can create its own problems. Am I missing anything here?
Two Thousand dollars in repair costs later, today we are having another severe storm, and I think I understand what happened. In today's case, my Powerwalls were charged to 99%. We went into Storm Watch, and the system diverted grid power to power the home. Under this scenario, any severe surge in power can now get past the gateway and damage equipment, whereas, without Storm Watch being activated, the system would be running off the Powerwalls as usual and would be isolated from surges. I have turned off Storm Watch because of this.
I think Storm Watch is useful if you need to charge your Powerwalls prior to an event that could result in a grid outage, but when it's active in the middle of a severe storm, I think it can create its own problems. Am I missing anything here?