I do not condemn the entire NYT staff on the basis of Broder and one Nocera piece. That's not rational.
Much of what Nocera wrote makes sense to me, but he missed on Tesla. Perhaps he considers the Model S too far from mainstream use based on the price, which is true, but he should have acknowledged the company and what it has accomplished.
Wrong! "Such a battery does not yet exist." Is just flagrantly Wrong. No qualifiers, exclusions, whatever, no matter how you parse it out, such a battery very much DOES exist. Sorry, ecar. I read a lot of the NYT too. This is terrible and stupid.