So this guy is invested in some battery company called Axion?
Big time. He is or was a director of Axion. Axion depends on the success of hybrid systems, so JP spends a lot of time and energy running down EV alternatives.
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So this guy is invested in some battery company called Axion?
Yes, which is why he's a huge EV naysayer. His main argument is EVs wastes batteries and micro-hybrids are the best use of batteries (a space that Axion was targeting). Axion has since moved away from micro-hybrid cars (the market just didn't materialize) and focuses more on 18-wheelers, but Petersen's anti-EV talk continues.So this guy is invested in some battery company called Axion?
Big time. He is or was a director of Axion. Axion depends on the success of hybrid systems, so JP spends a lot of time and energy running down EV alternatives.
Yes, which is why he's a huge EV naysayer. His main argument is EVs wastes batteries and micro-hybrids are the best use of batteries (a space that Axion was targeting). Axion has since moved away from micro-hybrid cars (the market just didn't materialize) and focuses more on 18-wheelers, but Petersen's anti-EV talk continues.
Hey -- don't underestimate the predictive value of someone who's wrong all the time. Just believe the opposite of what they say, and you have a *great* predictor!So far, i'm into JP's articles, about halfway in, man, he's been wrong in each and every time. It takes a special kind of pundit to be wrong that often. Seriously, coin flipping is a better predictor.
Now he's attacking renewables and grid storage. http://seekingalpha.com/article/1934751-stationary-energy-storage-pipe-dream-or-lead-pipe-cinch
He is so blinded by his hatred of EVs he can't make a logical decision.
At least some people have rescinded, even Fox news supports Tesla now, even after the big Palin/Romney flap.
Using Edison's analysis to discredit lithium ion batteries as storage for wind and solar power is absurd. When Edison wrote that article in 1883, solar cells had an efficiency of about 1%, wind turbines were just starting to be built, and lithium-ion batteries didn't exist.
Edison also opposed alternating current, and we all know how that turned out.
Now he's attacking renewables and grid storage. http://seekingalpha.com/article/1934751-stationary-energy-storage-pipe-dream-or-lead-pipe-cinch
What has Fox News done that would qualify as supporting Tesla? I'm not denying your assertion. I'm just not aware of anything different from them. The fires weren't exactly reported without bias, but that was true with almost all news sources. If Fox News is coming around, that pretty much leaves John Petersen and Rush Limbaugh as the biggest losers. Well, OK, there's still Sarah, Mitt, and a few others.
Buying AXPW, and shorting TSLA, was about two of the worst trades that one could have made a couple of years ago. That's like skydiving without a parachute, only with your money.